Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-26: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
https://tinyurl.com/y2kmjqmm for diff.
Alexey Melnikov via Datatracker wrote:
> --
> DISCUSS:
> --
> Thank you for this document. Despite
{clearing out todo items in my inbox}
Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> I presume I am missing something basic.
> I have tried to follow this discussion, as it seems to be about a critical
> aspect of whether the BRSKI work is acceptable.
> I have assumed that what we needed is the
Combining your August 9 and September 3 emails, and removing resolved items.
https://tinyurl.com/y2kmjqmm for diffs aginst -26.
(also includes changes for Alexey)
Submitting -27 in process.
Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>> This was asked by Eric as well.
>> It's the Subject Key Identifier that
Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
> - lack of TLS version, I understand your comment. You suggestion to add
> some text (justification, clarification, ...) in Section 5.1 about the
> TLS version would be a plus (albeit a -27 would be required) but I am
> removing my DISCUSS
I have
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and
Approach WG of the IETF.
Title : Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures
(BRSKI)
Authors : Max
