Re: [Anima] Proposed change to GRASP

> -Original Message- > From: Anima [mailto:anima-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sheng Jiang > Sent: 03 May 2016 04:03 > To: Brian E Carpenter ; Anima WG > > Subject: Re: [Anima] Proposed change to GRASP > [...] > One question: does this new

[Anima] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-03.txt

tf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] > Sent: 08 July 2016 14:54 > To: Michael Behringer (mbehring) <mbehr...@cisco.com>; Toerless Eckert > (eckert) <eck...@cisco.com>; Steinthor Bjarnason <sbjarna...@arbor.net> > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ani

[Anima] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-02.txt

Laurent Ciavaglia > <laurent.ciavag...@nokia.com>; Toerless Eckert (eckert) > <eck...@cisco.com>; Brian E. Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>; > Michael Behringer (mbehring) <mbehr...@cisco.com>; Bing Liu > <leo.liub...@huawei.com>; Brian Carpenter > <br

Re: [Anima] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-du-anima-an-intent-04.txt

> -Original Message- > From: Anima [mailto:anima-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E > Carpenter > Sent: 09 July 2016 12:39 > To: Laurent Ciavaglia ; anima > > Subject: Re: [Anima] Fwd: New Version Notification for

[Anima] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-05.txt

e “one link --> one ACP channel”. -- -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: 12 January 2017 18:34 To: Michael Behringer (mbehring) <mbehr...@cisco.com>; anima-cha...@ietf.org; Toerless Eckert <tte+i...@cs.fau.de>

Re: [Anima] GRASP issue 57: Add M_INVALID message?

> -Original Message- > From: Anima [mailto:anima-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E > Carpenter > Sent: 18 October 2016 22:05 > To: Anima WG > Subject: [Anima] GRASP issue 57: Add M_INVALID message? > > 57: Add M_INVALID message? > > MR: What does one do with an

Re: [Anima] Autonomic Registry

Hi Pedro, Thanks for your feedback and follow-up! Appreciated! Inline... > -Original Message- > From: Anima [mailto:anima-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pedro Martinez- > Julia > Sent: 15 November 2016 11:30 > To: anima@ietf.org > Subject: [Anima] Autonomic Registry > > Dear WG

Re: [Anima] The ACP is not an ASA, but...

> -Original Message- > From: Anima [mailto:anima-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E > Carpenter > Sent: 18 November 2016 10:32 > To: Anima WG > Subject: [Anima] The ACP is not an ASA, but... > > The ACP is not an ASA, it's actually a set of components, and probably it

Re: [Anima] Intent per ASA or per AF?

Agree, Laurent. Then let’s nail this down in the Intent draft: “Intent is defined per Autonomic Function”. Michael From: Laurent Ciavaglia [mailto:laurent.ciavag...@nokia-bell-labs.com] Sent: 18 November 2016 11:04 To: Michael Behringer (mbehring) <mbehr...@cisco.com>; anima@ietf.org Subje

Re: [Anima] Intent per ASA or per AF?

> -Original Message- > From: Michael Richardson [mailto:mcr+i...@sandelman.ca] > Sent: 20 November 2016 07:42 > To: Michael Behringer (mbehring) <mbehr...@cisco.com> > Cc: anima@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Anima] Intent per ASA or per AF? > > > Mi