Re: [Anima] GRASP issue 55: Could discovery be performed over TCP?

On 13/11/2016 20:31, Michael Richardson wrote: > Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> However, I think that we will have to replace the GRASP query with > >> something else, maybe just a CoAP request, as the TCP for GRASP is > >> rather too much for some.. To be

Re: [Anima] GRASP issue 55: Could discovery be performed over TCP?

MichaelR: I am confused about the reason for this discussion. It seems you are trying to figure out how to minimize the impact of the insecure multicast piece of GRASP, but in the context of ANIMA this question would be irrelevant, because we are not doing any insecure GRASP in BRSKY or ACP with

Re: [Anima] GRASP issue 55: Could discovery be performed over TCP?

Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 21/10/2016 01:56, Michael Richardson wrote: >> >> Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> >> What I was saying was, *IF* I know how to find a machine with an open >> >> GRASP_LISTEN_PORT, and I

Re: [Anima] GRASP issue 55: Could discovery be performed over TCP?

Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Michael is concerned by the use of insecure link-local multicast. No. That's not my concern, actually. My original concern was that, when doing discovery outside of the ACP, the client doing the discovery has to open a TCP port that