Re: [ansible-project] galaxy fails to install role due to incompatible version formats

it is strange to force people to remove past tags but thanks for the help! -- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ https://mastodon.social/@nusenu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[ansible-project] galaxy fails to install role due to incompatible version formats

A user reported the following issue: downloading role 'relayor', owned by nusenu [WARNING]: - nusenu.relayor was NOT installed successfully: Unable to compare role versions (v18.1.1, 0.1.0, v18.0.0, v0.3.0, v19.1.4, v19.1.0, v19.1.3, 0.2.0-rc, 0.1.0-alpha, v0.3.1, v0.3.3, v0.2.1, v19.1.2

[ansible-project] order of IPs in ansible_all_ipv*_addresses facts

- CentOS - Fedora thanks! nusenu [1] https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/devel/lib/ansible/module_utils/facts/network/linux.py [2] https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor -- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu twitter: @nusenu_ -- You received this message because you are subscribed

[ansible-project] clarification about using notify in the context of include_tasks

Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from "include" to import_* and include_* 's. During that the following question came up: Could I replace an include [1] with include_tasks even if the included file makes use of notify [2]? [1] https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/blob/ma

[ansible-project] relayor: Ansible role to deploy tor relays - v0.2.1 released

https://galaxy.ansible.com/nusenu/relayor/ https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor relayor helps you to deploy tor relays. Supported operating systems: Debian 8, Debian Testing CentOS 7 OpenBSD 6.0 FreeBSD 10.3, 11.0 Ubuntu 16.04 Fedora 25 unfortunately I'm

Re: [ansible-project] alphanum string filter?

Matt Martz: > Probably with the regex_replace filter: > > foo|regex_replace('[^a-zA-Z0-9]', '') thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[ansible-project] alphanum string filter?

.ansible.com/ansible/playbooks_filters.html thanks, nusenu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ansible-project+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To

[ansible-project] ansible's ip filter are broken since a long time - alternatives?

Hi, since ansible's ip filter are broken [1] and don't look like they get fixed anytime soon I'm wondering if there are any other easy options? thanks, nusenu [1] https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/14829 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [ansible-project][bugreport] single item lists?

Brian Coca: > The task executes once per item, I'm guessing it failed on the first one. After further tests I've come to the conclusion that this is actually a bug. I filed the bug report here: https://github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-core/issues/5708 Looking forward to your comments and a

Re: [ansible-project] single item lists?

I use it in a with_items loop: https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/blob/master/tasks/main.yml#L43 Or am I misreading the error message? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop recei

Re: [ansible-project] single item lists?

> "failed": true, > "invocation": { > "module_args": { > "build": false, > "name": "['tor']", > "ports_dir": "/usr/ports", > "state": "present" > } > }, > "item": [ > "tor" > ], > "msg": "Can't find

Re: [ansible-project] 'package' module does not like "{{ item }}" ?

turns out this role commit introduced the problem, it replaces the static string "tor" with the generic "{{ item }}". https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/commit/06eaad05443f5282b4ac74af688a5f6e60e45b83#diff-2444ad0870f91f17ca6c2a5e96b26823 -- You received this

[ansible-project] Regression in 'package' module?

kg on OpenBSD targets? (installing the tor package with the openbsd_pkg works fine) Have there been any major changes in the package module between ansible 2.0 and 2.2? thanks, nusenu https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/issues/85 [1] https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/commit/550d65

[ansible-project] find out the ansible version within ansible without shell/cmd?

Hi, is there a better way for this than to use shell+register? - name: get ansible version shell: ansible --version|head -1|cut -d" " -f2 delegate_to: 127.0.0.1 register: ansibleversion thanks, nusenu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo

Re: [ansible-project] Ansible 2.1.3 FINAL has been released!

nusenu: > Is there a mailing list one can sign up to, to just get release > announcements? https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/ansible-announce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from thi

Re: [ansible-project] Ansible 2.1.3 FINAL has been released!

y fix for CVE-2016-8614 - apt_key module not properly validating > keys in some situations. If ansible v2.2.0 fixed two vulnerabilities (CVE-2016-8628, CVE-2016-8614) why was there no mention about that in the release announcement? Is there a mailing list one can sign up to, to just get release ann

Re: [ansible-project] Ansible 2.1.2 RC2 is ready for testing

James Cammarata: > Hi nusenu, I'll take a look at that again as we will be doing a RC3 for > 2.1.2. > thank you, looking forward to a version with a fix for this regression. nusenu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible

Re: [ansible-project] Ansible 2.1.2 RC2 is ready for testing

Hi, are there any plans to fix regression [1] with ansible version 2.1.2? [1] https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/14829 thanks, nusenu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this grou

[ansible-project] How much would you charge to fix regression #14829?

a fix merged and released within the next two months? thanks, nusenu [1] https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/14829 [2] https://galaxy.ansible.com/nusenu/relayor/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubs

[ansible-project] ansible-relayor 0.1.0 released

Hi, ansible-relayor is an ansible role for tor relay operators. Whether you setup/operate a single or many relays, ansible-relayor can help you automate all steps including secure offline key [2] generation, multi-instance setup and MyFamily management. https://galaxy.ansible.com/nusenu/relayor

[ansible-project] porting this with_together loop from ansible 1.9.4 -> 2.0.1.0

avior: The loop should not fail even if the host has no IPv6 IPs (it used to work fine with v1.9.4) Is this a bug/regression or an expected behavior change? [1] https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/blob/61a4057895a1c98e8b895e75bc1df30033af502a/tasks/ip-list.yml#L3 -- You received this message

Re: [ansible-project] Will bugfix #12062 be backported to ansible 1.9.x?

> thanks! > > https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/12062 > https://github.com/ansible/ansible/commit/b2bfe3502b1bb73927d08ea0fcf964a508129267 Since this bug blocks a feature in my role [1], I'm also happy if there are any known workarounds. Thanks! [1] https://github.com

Re: [ansible-project] iterating over IPv4/IPv6 (parallel) + TCP ports (nested)

> sorry, did not test, surprised it does not take a list, maybe it has to be > quoted ? I'm not able to get this to work, if anyone is, please let me know. There is no documentations about lookup('together', ..) on https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/playbooks_lookups.html I made a request for

[ansible-project] Will bugfix #12062 be backported to ansible 1.9.x?

Hi, I'm running ansible 1.9.4 (released in Oct 2015) and am hitting a bug that has been fixed in August 2015, but the fix is apparently in ansible 2.0 only. Manually applying the fix to my 1.9.4 installation resolves the problem. Will this bugfix be backported? thanks!

Re: [ansible-project] Re: group_vars produces error

Sascha Andres: > When switching to root it works, using a user having sudo rights with > NOPASSWD it does not work did you specify 'become: yes' (for the sudo case)? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [ansible-project] iterating over IPv4/IPv6 (parallel) + TCP ports (nested)

> similar to a question from about a year ago [1], I'm looking for the > best way to loop over 3 lists: > > - {{ ansible_all_ipv4_addresses }} > - {{ ansible_all_ipv6_addresses | ipv6('public') }} > - tcpports > > > ipv4 and ipv6 IPs should iterate in parallel (I'll check that their list >

Re: [ansible-project] iterating over IPv4/IPv6 (parallel) + TCP ports (nested)

> with_items: > - {{ ansible_all_ipv4_addresses }} > - {{ ansible_all_ipv6_addresses | ipv6('public') }} > - tcpports > > > ^ will flatten to single list > > or you can use union to get unique single list: > > with_items: "{{ >

Re: [ansible-project] iterating over IPv4/IPv6 (parallel) + TCP ports (nested)

Brian Coca: > ah, misunderstood the question, you wan to combine the nested and together > lookups (possible example): > > with_nested: > - "{{tcpports}}" > - "{{lookup('together', [ansible_all_ipv4_addresses, > ansible_all_ipv6_addresses | ipv6('public')] }}" Since I certainly will need

Re: [ansible-project] Re: galaxy vs. Ubuntu 15.10

Chris Houseknecht: > Task runner infrastructure upgraded. Hopefully we'll see better > performance. thanks. > Added Ubuntu Wily. Does one has to use the codename? "15.10" does not seem to work still. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible

[ansible-project] iterating over IPv4/IPv6 (parallel) + TCP ports (nested)

Hi, similar to a question from about a year ago [1], I'm looking for the best way to loop over 3 lists: - {{ ansible_all_ipv4_addresses }} - {{ ansible_all_ipv6_addresses | ipv6('public') }} - tcpports ipv4 and ipv6 IPs should iterate in parallel (I'll check that their list lengths are

[ansible-project] galaxy import: "Waiting to start..."

Hi, an hour after importing a new role [1] it still says: Waiting to start..." in "View Role Import Details". How long does it usually take to import a role? thanks! [1] nusenu/ansible-relayor -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &

Re: [ansible-project] Re: galaxy import: "Waiting to start..."

Chris Houseknecht: > The task runner that handles imports has been restarted and the task queue > cleared. If you click the 're-import' button now, it should now start right > away. We're having some challenges with the task runner and planning to > make some adjustments this evening.

[ansible-project] Why does galaxy need write access to github repositories?

Hi, when logging in into galaxy.ansible.com, galaxy asks for write access to repositories, why is that? Is it possible to have a role on galaxy without giving galaxy write access to github repositories? thanks, nusenu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[ansible-project] galaxy: reame formatting problems

Hi, there seems to be a problem with galaxy displaying READMEs, see: https://galaxy.ansible.com/nusenu/relayor/ vs https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor especially the sections: Requirements Available Role Tags -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [ansible-project] Re: galaxy: reame formatting problems

Chris Houseknecht: > GitHub's markdown is a little more forgiving than Galaxy. Galaxy stores the > raw README and translates to HTML on request. Galaxy also has its own CSS > styles, so by definition what you see on Galaxy will be a little different. > > We have been doing some work on the

Re: [ansible-project] Re: Why does galaxy need write access to github repositories?

Chris Houseknecht: > Galaxy asks for the following scopes used to access the GitHub API: > > - user:email > - public_repo > - read:org > > These are defined here: https://developer.github.com/v3/oauth/#scopes > > The last two allow us to see the orgs you belong to and the repos you have >

Re: [ansible-project] Re: galaxy import: "Waiting to start..."

> Chris Houseknecht: >> The task runner that handles imports has been restarted and the task queue >> cleared. If you click the 're-import' button now, it should now start right >> away. We're having some challenges with the task runner and planning to >> make some adjustments this evening. >

Re: [ansible-project] understanding fetch module's security implications

Brian Coca: > Prefixing with trusted vars is still open to directory traversal. oh that is true, thanks for pointing that out! (example: 1.1.1.1/../foo-2.2.2.2) > In > most cases you can setup your systems so the variable data is set by > the 'master' always and not derived from the target,

Re: [ansible-project] understanding fetch module's security implications

Brian Coca: > Prefixing with trusted vars is still open to directory traversal. I hope the ipv4('address') filter method is safe? https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/commit/d2c2108a8850241369aa8867faf4ac53246171d5 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo

[ansible-project] security guidelines for ansible role creators?

Hi, are there security guidelines for ansible role creators found somewhere that lists common security pitfalls that one should look at to avoid things like [1][2] and other such cases? thanks! [1]https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/commit/09f9afe7096395cb95310b8fb454c2b640ed17d9 [2

Re: [ansible-project] understanding fetch module's security implications

I tried to address this security problem (which turned out to be more severe then I initially thought, because it probably allowed a relay to steal keys) by prefixing the fact with a var that can not be manipulated by the target server ( inventory_hostname ). https://github.com/nusenu/ansible

[ansible-project] command - only if one out of several files doesn't exist? (creates)

Hi, I'd like to run a command only if at least one out of several files does not exist, is that possible with the creates parameter of the command module? thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this

[ansible-project] security implications of: local_action: shell command {{ fact_var }}

Hi, similar to a previous question [1] that was answered by Brian I'm wondering if the following example gives the remote server remote command execution privileges on the ansible host (which obviously no one wants): local_action: shell cat {{ fact123 }} Is that a bad idea? Can the remote

Re: [ansible-project] security implications of: local_action: shell command {{ fact_var }}

thanks for your fast reply! Brian Coca: > No, Ansible can only protect you so much, like in normal shell, you > really want to quote variable input: > > `cat "{{fact123}}"` would work the same as when running a shell script > `cat "$MYVAR"` So you confirm that my example gives the remote

Re: [ansible-project] Can ternary() be used with vars or static strings only?

Matt Martz: > (ansible_pkg_mgr != 'apt')| ternary(tor_user, > '_tor-' ~ item[0] ~ '_' ~ item.1.orport) thanks, works! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

Re: [ansible-project] understanding fetch module's security implications

thanks for your answer! > - the fact variables (what ansible_all_ipv4_addresses is) are > sanitized against template injection but not verified against > directories, most variables can legitimately return such structures. > The attacker would have to know your exact playbook to do this, as you >

[ansible-project] understanding fetch module's security implications

Hi, I consider the ansible host as trusted, the target server that is managed with ansible is considered less trusted (it might start attacks against the ansible host). Does ansible's security design match that threat model in general? Given the following fetch module example: - fetch: src={{

[ansible-project] copy module: fail if remote file exists and is different from source?

' parameter. I would need a fail_on_remotefileexists_but_different ;) Currently one is left with - backup=yes or - force=no but both parameter won't help for the specific use-case. Anyone else had this use-case yet and made a workaround? thanks, nusenu [1] https://docs.ansible.com/ansible

Re: [ansible-project] copy module: fail if remote file exists and is different from source?

d? My workaround procedure is [1]: 1) copy with force=no 2) fetch 3) compare files locally via shell (sha1sum) 4) fail if fingerprints do not match If there is a less dirty solution let me know ;) [1] https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/commit/b2462b6b8b4ed3b1351ff167c6dd5f7ed3263e

Re: [ansible-project] performing a local task on every (remote) loop iteration - is that even possible?

solution: https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/playbooks_delegation.html#delegation -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[ansible-project] performing a local task on every (remote) loop iteration - is that even possible?

2.2.2.2_80 2.2.2.2_443 3.3.3.3_80 4.4.4.4_80 Is that possible? thanks, nusenu [1] https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/blob/master/tasks/configure.yml#L3 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this grou

Re: [ansible-project] rpm_key: Fedora 22: Failed to find required executable gpg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 open a bug, first I'm not sure rpm_key should be used on fedora 22 as it has switched to dnf as it's default package manager, 2nd the rpm_key should fallback to the gpg2 name if gpg is not found. for those interested in Fedora 22 as well, these

Re: [ansible-project] Re: How to manage authorized_keys?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Unfortunately, It's not useful for multiple keys to quote the documentation again: *Multiple* keys can be specified in a single key string value by separating them by newlines. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [ansible-project] Re: How to manage authorized_keys?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 But, when I decide to remove user2_key, It still persists in authorized_key file! It's unacceptable! maybe you find the 'exclusive' parameter useful? http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/authorized_key_module.html Whether to remove all other

[ansible-project] rpm_key: Fedora 22: Failed to find required executable gpg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 The rpm_key module fails on Fedora 22 due to missing gpg binary. Fedora 22 has no gpg executable but only gpg2. Is it my responsibility to provide a link gpg - gpg2 or should the module cover this out of the box? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

[ansible-project] Fedora 22: ansible_pkg_mgr: yum vs. dnf

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I'd like to get 'dnf' as an answer when asking a F22 system for ansible_pkg_mgr. What do you think about it? thanks, nusenu -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVsmaDAAoJEFv7XvVCELh0gNcP/0dUIMs8AsijvaUbtQpusPOn

Re: [ansible-project] Fedora 22: ansible_pkg_mgr: yum vs. dnf

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I'd like to get 'dnf' as an answer when asking a F22 system for ansible_pkg_mgr. What do you think about it? Since the ansible module 'yum' fails on F22 (even after 'dnf install yum'), I'm even considering this a bug:

[ansible-project] how to abort playbook run on first failed host during 'gathering facts' phase?

as soon as one host fails the 'gathering facts' phase? (something better than manual ctrl-c?) thanks, nusenu -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVfz8JAAoJEFv7XvVCELh0EhwQAINC9lwVS/BytVogD0G4SqLV NxcXac3zbQl9NvB2OoyJ6tIPL2quiESUx4UBRqnb3SnarjZ25HmMqPwMJtTylWHC R5xMcNXjShdjD9KT1dgnN21YdhkMuN7/P

Re: [ansible-project] how to abort playbook run on first failed host during 'gathering facts' phase?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Brian Coca: you might want to play with serial and max fails. http://docs.ansible.com/playbooks_delegation.html thank you, I'll go with max_fail_percentage: 1 serial: 1 to abort on the first failed host. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

[ansible-project] when check comparing stdout against numeric value?

a numeric value? If I invert the check stdout 2 it actually runs even though 7030 is not greater than 2. Is '' non-numeric? thanks! [1] https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/blob/master/tasks/openbsd_install.yml#L22 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVfXMcAAoJEFv7XvVCELh0NiQP

Re: [ansible-project] when check comparing stdout against numeric value?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Try this when: currentlimits.stdout|int 2 that fixed it, thank you! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVfeczAAoJEFv7XvVCELh0F1kP/j4tJmIMIOG6ku7gW/kpfeSK 6LczntIwU6cSK3jhHkFJKheUTtqesvd+1dltIzHbtlnKLFb7F4uujibPF8ufhZKB

Re: [ansible-project] --tags tag1 AND tag2, possible?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Brian Coca: I was not thinking of a specific ticket, but there should be many instances of this being requested via the maliing lists and IRC and even as comments in other tag related tickets. ok sounds like one should create an issue for it:

[ansible-project] --tags tag1 AND tag2, possible?

' (which includes tasks tagged as freebsd,install - results in lot of skipping again), is there a way to say run only 'debian' *AND* 'install' tagged tasks? thanks! nusenu -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVcK1HAAoJEFv7XvVCELh0sZwP/j+/YvS3+jXD3OPGFZNTwdSp 7EvZ15583hP5/fCm1I30ZlTBl31K4xVYiOA

Re: [ansible-project] --tags tag1 AND tag2, possible?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Brian Coca: not currently, a feature request we have is that tags get 'host expressions', so this would look like; tag1:tag2 but there is currently no code that does this thanks for the prompt reply. I tried to find that feature

Re: [ansible-project] bug in service module: failing to disable (enabled=no) legacy sysv services on systemd target

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 just in case other are also stumbling over this debian systemd bug, this was my temporary workaround until debian fixes this issue: https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/commit/efabec452f715b884528e70 a9b1e012051692acd if you want to track

Re: [ansible-project] bug in service module: failing to disable (enabled=no) legacy sysv services on systemd target

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 for the record, this is a known debian systemd bug that affects ansible's service module: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751638 https://github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-core/issues/915 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [ansible-project] bug in service module: failing to disable (enabled=no) legacy sysv services on systemd target

for the record, this is a known debian systemd bug that affects ansible's service module: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751638 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ansible Project group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[ansible-project] bug in service module: failing to disable (enabled=no) legacy sysv services on systemd target

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I'm not entirely sure whether this should be considered an ansible or systemctl bug. This email mainly targets of making others aware of this problem. If you want to disable (enabled=no) a service on a systemd host which is still using legacy

Re: [ansible-project] bug in service module: failing to disable (enabled=no) legacy sysv services on systemd target

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I asked systemd-devel about is-enabled support for legacy services: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-April/030652.ht ml -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVKt2bAAoJEFv7XvVCELh0u8oQAKW4BGaeGDhjKc21TeQiXuqZ

Re: [ansible-project] bug in service module when enabling multiple systemd (multi-instance) services?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Hi, yes definitely test this out with either devel or 1.9.x to see if the issue has been fixed (I know there were some fixes in service regarding systemd). If not, definitely let us know or open a github issue. As I wrote [1] on 2015-04-04

Re: [ansible-project] bug in service module when enabling multiple systemd (multi-instance) services?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Nusenu: Ok, the problem seems to be that ansible probably runs status on the particular service before enabling it (to avoid unnecessary systemctl enable commands?). actually the service module executes [1]: systemctl is-enabled tor@bar.service

Re: [ansible-project] bug in service module when enabling multiple systemd (multi-instance) services?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Can anyone confirm this bug or am I missing something? Ok, the problem seems to be that ansible probably runs status on the particular service before enabling it (to avoid unnecessary systemctl enable commands?). systemctl output for the *not*

[ansible-project] with_nested - limit loop iteration count

that I could use.. 2) assign unique TCP port to a service to prevent duplicate bindings here is the ansible role where this would be useful for me: https://github.com/nusenu/relayor/blob/master/tasks/configure.yml thanks, Nusenu -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

[ansible-project] match() documentation bug?

Hi, I'd say the documentation [1] for match() is not entirely clear: ‘match’ will require a complete match in the string, while ‘search’ will require a match inside of the string. after reading this I wouldn't expect that abc|match(a) is true. I run this on ansible 1.8.2: vars: input:

Re: [ansible-project] backreference to 'all hosts in scope of current task'?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Serge van Ginderachter: On 22 February 2015 at 14:37, Nusenu nus...@openmailbox.org wrote: Is there a way to say loop over all hosts in scope of current task? ​The special variable​ 'play_hosts' is what you are looking for. http

[ansible-project] backreference to 'all hosts in scope of current task'?

? {% for host in groups['groupname'] %} {% for item in hostvars[host]['varfoo']['results'] -%}$ {{ item.stdout }}, {%- endfor %} {% endfor %} thanks, Nusenu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ansible Project group. To unsubscribe

Re: [ansible-project] design considerations when writing multi-platform roles

/* --- thank you, Nusenu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ansible Project group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ansible-project+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email

[ansible-project] group_var not visible in role?

tries to access user1. Is this expected? thanks, Nusenu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ansible Project group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ansible-project+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post

[ansible-project] multi-platform role support: setting vars according to OS

based on facts (while still encapsulating it in a role)? thanks! Nusenu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ansible Project group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ansible-project+unsubscr

Re: [ansible-project] with_nested loop count limit?

I got it working. I combined 'bar' and 'tra' in a dictionary and used that in with_nested Now I'm left with the question: How can I limit the amount of loops in a with_nested loop? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ansible Project group. To

[ansible-project] combining with_nested: + with_together: (incl. loop count limit)

a certain amount of loop executions. On a simple loop I would use 'with_indexed_items:' and check the index against a given max value. How would that loop count limit be implemented in the loop described above? thanks! Nusenu [1] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/ansible-devel/aLrH_SC8HyY/FZPs7GanHysJ