Hi Alessandro,
Hi Jordi and all,
TL;DR: Fail2ban can deal with missing or non-responding abuse teams
automatically, without the need to load RIPE with extra costs.
[Jordi] Yes and not!
If you mean reporting to existing and *working* abuse-c, yes, but if the
abuse-c
Hi Jordi and all,
TL;DR: Fail2ban can deal with missing or non-responding abuse teams
automatically, without the need to load RIPE with extra costs.
In the draft minutes I read:
Jordi said he thinks it will work because smaller providers use more and
more Open Source tools
Dear all,
I am a researcher at TU Delft in the Netherlands, looking into Network
Security, Protocol Adoption and human factors.
My student Olamide is looking into how well _sending_ email setups are
maintained around the globe.
For this, we need many people, ideally from 'smaller' providers,
Thank you.
However I should be clear, this was not an attempt to start a new thread on the
proposal, rather to check the minutes of the WG session.
The Co-Chairs, along with Jordi, have decided that 2019-04 will go forward to
review phase, while noting all of the comments both for and against,
The complaint to RIPE mechanism should only be an escalation mechanism
when the ISP does not respond.
The cost of dealing with the investigation by RIPE should be passed on
to the irresponsibly resource holder who did not properly respond to the
abuse complaint.
On 7/07/2020 6:26 pm,
Colleagues,
Please find attached the draft minutes from our working group session at RIPE
80.
Could you let the Co-Chairs know, by Friday 17th July, if there are any errors
or omissions?
Thanks,
Brian
Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG
Brian Nisbet
Service Operations Manager
HEAnet CLG, Ireland's
