> I disagree that it did not reach consensus. There was never any proper
> measure of whether it reached consensus.
i will admit to being lazy/busy and have not looked at pdp to confirm.
but ...
i believe that the way we measure consensus is by looking at the faces
of the co-chairs. that's why
Jordi,
Thank you, yes, we're aware of that, and I know you know the PDP quite well,
but I felt it was worth stating the relevant piece for others.
We will be back to you soon.
Brian
Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG
Brian Nisbet
Service Operations Manager
HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and
I don’t think this is correct, at least not for google, amazon, and other big
providers, which I send email with abuses every other day and they react to it
and resolve them.
El 8/9/20 16:33, "anti-abuse-wg en nombre de Alex de Joode"
escribió:
As abuse notices might have legal
El mié, 09-09-2020 a las 08:52 +0200, Alessandro Vesely escribió:
> On Tue 08/Sep/2020 16:33:20 +0200 Alex de Joode wrote:
> > A webform, for a regulator, most likely will be seen as an
> > 'upgrade'. Note that FB and Google also *only accept* complaints,
> > notices etc via webforms. So one can
Hi Brian,
I’ve already sent you (and the co-chairs and policy officer) my rational for
disagreement yesterday.
I’m not sure if I need to copy to the list (I will read the PDP for refreshing
myself on the appeals process later on today) or how much I should wait for
your response before
Morning,
If you have specific disagreements with the Co-Chairs, then please contact us
at aa-wg-ch...@ripe.net with the your reasoning for 2019-04 has reached
consensus.
The appeals procedure beyond that is detailed in RIPE 710 and I have copied &
pasted the specific paragraph here:
"If a
On Tue 08/Sep/2020 16:33:20 +0200 Alex de Joode wrote:
A webform, for a regulator, most likely will be seen as an 'upgrade'. Note that
FB and Google also *only accept* complaints, notices etc via webforms. So one
can argue a webform is abuse@ 2.0 :) So I do not share you view that a webform
