Re: [anti-abuse-wg] IPv4 squatting -- Courtesy of AS44050, AS58552

2020-12-01 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=B6ma_Gavrichenkov?= wrote: >On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:09 AM Ronald F. Guilmette > wrote: >> Please be advised that the set of IPv4 blocks listed below appear to be >> squatted on at the present time, with the apparent aid and assistance of >> AS44050 -- "Petersburg

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] IPv4 squatting -- Courtesy of AS44050, AS58552

2020-12-01 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message , Brian Nisbet wrote: >However I suspect that X-posting to a list like apnic-talk may not be the >wisest idea, given the different populations etc... It is among my fondest hopes that cybercriminals of all stripes, and particularly the ones who squat on IPv4 space that doesn't belong

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] IPv4 squatting -- Courtesy of AS44050, AS58552

2020-12-01 Thread Töma Gavrichenkov
Peace, On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:09 AM Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > Please be advised that the set of IPv4 blocks listed below appear to be > squatted on at the present time, with the apparent aid and assistance of > AS44050 -- "Petersburg Internet Network Ltd." (Russia) and also AS58552 -- >

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] IPv4 squatting -- Courtesy of AS44050, AS58552

2020-12-01 Thread Brian Nisbet
Ronald, I'm glad you aren't offended/upset, but I agree with Randy's interpretation, especially as the initial email added no light/signal to the conversation at all. Despite what may be believed the Co-Chairs don't like putting people in moderation, but we will if we have to. However I

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] IPv4 squatting -- Courtesy of AS44050, AS58552

2020-12-01 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Mon 30/Nov/2020 22:56:22 +0100 John Levine wrote: In article , Richard Clayton wrote: Only a few of them are listed on https://www.spamhaus.org/drop/ So announcing a prefix that is on that list is not a good sign (indeed far from it) -- but don't expect a "new" hijacker to only choose