Since you brought up m3aawg I will note that it does have a best current
practice for block lists which specifically declares that asking for payment
for removal is not acceptable
RIPE should consider only listing block lists that are managed according to
accepted best practices
i think two things are being confused here; what the measurement folk
find useful and what the anti-spam folk find useful. the ncc and ripe
stat is not supplying the latter.
it is the mail operators' choice of which anti-spam techniques to use,
and i do that with one hat. but with a different
On Thu 04/Mar/2021 17:16:34 +0100 Christian Teuschel wrote:
If I am reading the feedback in this discussion correctly, the sentiment
is leaning towards adding more RBLs instead of less and if that is the
case we are going to look into how and when we can achieve this. Please
let me know if that
El jue, 04-03-2021 a las 17:16 +0100, Christian Teuschel wrote:
> Hi Elvis and Suresh, dear colleagues,
>
> Putting exact numbers on how many operators are using UCEProtect is
> difficult, but through feedback from users, network operators and
> members we understand that it is in use and that
> Given that, if RIPE NCC and its community doesn't trust UCEProtect
my impression is that this wg does not really like or trust anything.
it's all about not liking and rage at the machine.
imiho, it is very useful that ripe stat has longitudinal measurement
data on a few anti-spam technologies.
On 2021-03-04 18:16, Christian Teuschel wrote:
Hi Elvis and Suresh, dear colleagues,
Putting exact numbers on how many operators are using UCEProtect is
difficult, but through feedback from users, network operators and
members we understand that it is in use and that the provisioning of
this
Christian,
Speaking purely personally, I would certainly be in favour of RIPEstat
featuring more RBLs, yes.
Brian
Brian Nisbet
Service Operations Manager
HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network
1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland
+35316609040
Hi Elvis and Suresh, dear colleagues,
Putting exact numbers on how many operators are using UCEProtect is
difficult, but through feedback from users, network operators and
members we understand that it is in use and that the provisioning of
this RBL on RIPEstat has value.
If I am reading the
Hi Christian,
while it may be useful to have their data source, it only shows the RIPE
NCC favors one or two operators and I think that is damaging to the
whole idea of being impartial.
You either include a good list of blacklist operators and their data or
none. Including only a couple
