In message ,
Randy Bush wrote:
>interesting wg to do routing security analysis.
To be 100% clear, it was not my intention that anyone here should attempt
to engage in any sort of "security analysis" with respect to the current
rather inexplicable routing for much DoD IPv4 address space. I
[ brian lured me into the abuse circle; so reposting with routing ]
interesting wg to do routing security analysis.
as i do really not know the dod's or their proxy's motive(s), i can not
say much about their tactics let alone strategy.
i do know, and have actually seen and experienced, part of
Randy,
Ah, I don't know how that happened, but Ronald X-posted to Routing and I
managed not to. Don't worry, we're not trying to steal their family jewels.
Brian
Brian Nisbet (he/him)
Service Operations Manager
HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network
1st Floor, 5
interesting wg to do routing security analysis.
as i do really not know the dod's or their proxy's motive(s), i can not
say much about their tactics let alone strategy.
i do know, and have actually seen and experienced, part of 11/8 being
used as if it was 1918 space; ripe bologna was the first
Ronald,
Interesting, thanks. I've also been reading Geoff Heuston on this, albeit with
a different focus to the AP article. https://labs.apnic.net/?p=1431
Brian
Brian Nisbet (he/him)
Service Operations Manager
HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network
1st Floor, 5
