Re: [anti-abuse-wg] IS3C public consultation on an alternative narrative to deploy Internet standards

2024-03-11 Thread John Levine
It appears that Michele Neylon - Blacknight via anti-abuse-wg said: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Serge > >Several ccTLD registries have given discounts for DNSSEC. > >What is unclear is how many of the domains with DNSSEC enabled are in active >use, so the lack of �problems� could be simply

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] IS3C public consultation on an alternative narrative to deploy Internet standards

2024-03-11 Thread David Conrad via anti-abuse-wg
Hi, I've focused my comments specifically on the section entitled "The Alternative Narrative, a Call To Action for Leaders”. While I understand the desire to encourage DNSSEC and RPKI deployment at the leadership level, however if you’’re targeting policy makers and C-levels, I would strongly

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] IS3C public consultation on an alternative narrative to deploy Internet standards

2024-03-11 Thread Michele Neylon - Blacknight via anti-abuse-wg
Serge Several ccTLD registries have given discounts for DNSSEC. What is unclear is how many of the domains with DNSSEC enabled are in active use, so the lack of “problems” could be simply down to a complete lack of us / ignorance that the technology was enabled. My main issue with focus on

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Call For Agenda Items - RIPE88

2024-03-11 Thread Brian Nisbet
And to be clear, you can​ present from Rome, but the meeting will definitely be in Kraków... (Thank you to all of you who pointed out I'd changed one reference, but not the other!) Brian Brian Nisbet (he/him) Service Operations Manager HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] IS3C public consultation on an alternative narrative to deploy Internet standards

2024-03-11 Thread Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg
Pushing for DNSSEC adoption by financial services, government and other “enterprise” users makes a lot of sense, but pushing it for all domains is a terrible idea and has more negative impacts than positives. Not if it's done properly, i.e. by the hosting providers. Should your aunt or

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] IS3C public consultation on an alternative narrative to deploy Internet standards

2024-03-11 Thread Michele Neylon - Blacknight via anti-abuse-wg
They’re two very different things so asking about the two and pushing for them at the same time in my view is a bad idea. RPKI is only going to be deployed by network operators and they *should* have the technical ability to do this and doing so is “good” DNSSEC, on the other hand, is

[anti-abuse-wg] Call For Agenda Items - RIPE88

2024-03-11 Thread Brian Nisbet
Colleagues, As we move further into spring in Europe, it is time to think about the agenda for our next WG meeting, at RIPE 88 in Kraków - https://ripe88.ripe.net/ Registration for the meeting, running from the 20th - 24th May, is open. The Anti-Abuse WG will be meeting and Markus, Tobias and

[anti-abuse-wg] IS3C public consultation on an alternative narrative to deploy Internet standards

2024-03-11 Thread Wout de Natris
Dear colleagues, IGF DC IS3C invites you to participate in the consultation on positively enhancing the deployment of two Internet standards: DNSSEC and RPKI. You are invited to answer either of these questions: Do the arguments used to favor a positive decision, convince you to order