Michele Neylon - Blacknight via anti-abuse-wg wrote on 10/02/2022 10:49:
I also find the ridiculously broad definition of abuse so broad that it
renders any output without much merit.
"It's always DNS!"
A comparable style of analysis could find that TCP was a good root cause
candidate for
ness Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Farzaneh
Badiei
Date: Wednesday, 9 February 2022 at 15:16
To: Markus de Brün , anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: [dns-wg] EU: DNS abuse study
[EXTERNAL E
I probably should say this on the DNS mailing list but I find it quite
curious that the study surveyed such limited stakeholders, and
mainly the intellectual property crowd.
"We gathered the data and inputs from stakeholders with two questionnaires:
1) the first one surveyed registries,
www.heanet.ie
Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Ronald F.
Guilmette
Sent: Tuesday 8 February 2022 10:01
To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: [dns-wg] EU: DNS abuse study
CAUTION
In message ,
=?UTF-8?Q?Markus_de_Br=c3=bcn?= wrote:
>f) The top five most abused registrars account for 48% of all
>maliciously registered domain names (Appendix 1 - Technical Report,
>Section 11.2, pp. 43-44).
Hey! I have an idea!
What if we created one global organization to accredit and
For those who are not following the DNS wg list:
The European Commission has published a quite comprehensive study on DNS
abuse. (One could also call it enormous.)
It study itself be found here:
