should move a motion on this group that the group be renamed
to :
"Anti-Anti-abuse Working Group"
- Original Message ----- Subject: RE: [anti-abuse-wg] Periodic
Reminder: List Conduct
From: "Brian Nisbet"
Date: 1/20/20 8:19 pm
To: "Fi Shing" , "an
Hi,
> I understand perfectly the concerns of those colleagues who actually want to
> promote a better responsible behaviour and ensure the resources allocated to
> the LIR-s are not abused or there is an effective mechanism to stop abuse.
> However, as the chair kindly pointed, RIPE policy
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 05:10:46PM +0200, Tõnu Tammer via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
> However, as the chair kindly pointed, RIPE policy development follows
> certain rules: https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-710 which in
> first part of the document clearly states: "Conclusions are
Tõnu Tammer via anti-abuse-wg wrote on 20/01/2020 15:10:
According to Oxford Dictionary, consensus means an opinion that all
members of a group agree with.
generally speaking, internet related groups use the rfc7282 approach to
determining consensus.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7282
Good evening!
I understand perfectly the concerns of those colleagues who actually
want to promote a better responsible behaviour and ensure the resources
allocated to the LIR-s are not abused or there is an effective mechanism
to stop abuse.
However, as the chair kindly pointed, RIPE policy
-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Periodic Reminder: List Conduct
It appears you missed the point of my email.
How can you say rules apply to this list, but not RIPE itself?
Given the logic of many on this list:
1. You are not the internet police,
2. Some people may not agree
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Fi Shing
Date: Saturday 18 January 2020 at 07:23
To: "anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net"
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Periodic Reminder: List Conduct
It appears you missed the point of my email.
How can you say rules apply to this list, but not RIPE itself?
G
On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 08:21, Fi Shing wrote:
> Some people may not agree with a rule, so therefore there are no rules at all,
Even if your friend/employer told you not to smoke on *their*
premises...(?) Whenever you particpate in a community, or are with
friends and/or family. There will always
, as an administrator enforcing this rule of "no personal attacks" would
require you to open your emails, which is too much to ask of you as an
administrator.
- Original Message - Subject: RE: [anti-abuse-wg] Periodic
Reminder: List Conduct
From: "Brian Nisbet"
Date: 1/17
No. 20036270
From: anti-abuse-wg On Behalf Of Fi Shing
Sent: Friday 17 January 2020 11:33
To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Periodic Reminder: List Conduct
>> but we can tell you not to do it here, so please don't.
Well... no, i disagree.
Brian Nisbet, i woul
Original Message - Subject: [anti-abuse-wg] Periodic
Reminder: List Conduct
From: "Brian Nisbet"
Date: 1/17/20 8:23 pm
To: "anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net"
Colleagues,
It seems that at some point in every large list discussion I am compelled to
send a mail of this type. T
11 matches
Mail list logo
