Peace,
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020, 12:40 AM Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> The first is doing everything possible to try to get RPKI adopted more
> widely.
>
Totally agree,
The second is persuading everyone, certainly including Petersburg Internet,
> to stop even trying to use an data from RADB. That
In message
,
IP Abuse Research wrote:
>What the
>continued findings indicate is a need for IANA and the RIRs to adapt to a
>new stage in the resource issuance and governance lifecycle. Since this is
>by definition a working group, would it make sense to establish some
>metrics to quantify the
Peace,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020, 1:48 PM Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> Yes, but if any of -our- criminals attack people or businesses located in
> other countries, we will allow them to be extradited to those other
> countries
> to face trial.
>
This is slowly sliding into the territory of
In message
,
=?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=B6ma_Gavrichenkov?= wrote:
>> Neither AS44050 nor AS58552 was never announcing any of the squatted
>> prefixes themselves directly.
>> Rather AS44050 was... for reasons which have yet to be explained... peering
>> with the set of four apparently squatted ASNs
>
In message
,
Brian Nisbet wrote:
>My comments about the apnic-talk address was that I wasn't sure if that list
>was used to the kind of content, and I was worried that it might not get
>Ronald's message where it would it best for it to go...
I've looked around and frankly, the pickings, when
: "anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net"
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] IPv4 squatting -- Courtesy of AS44050, AS58552
Mr. Michele have no proposals, all he can do is to complain.
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Suresh
Ramasubramanian
Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 20
ubject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] IPv4 squatting -- Courtesy of AS44050, AS58552
I don’t think it’s simply a matter of two sides, which your language attempts
to categorise it as.
Some of us refuse to have our processes and businesses dictated to by people
who won’t listen to reasonable argumen
020 at 7:25 PM
To: Serge Droz
Cc: "anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net"
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] IPv4 squatting -- Courtesy of AS44050, AS58552
I'd like to second Serge's sentiment, RFG catches a good deal of abuse for his
contributions, which we have all seen on this and other lists. What the
con
I'd like to second Serge's sentiment, RFG catches a good deal of abuse for
his contributions, which we have all seen on this and other lists. What the
continued findings indicate is a need for IANA and the RIRs to adapt to a
new stage in the resource issuance and governance lifecycle. Since this
Peace,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:42 PM Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
> AS44050 is basically the SOHO provider for the St. Petersburg Internet
> Exchange. St. Petersburg's population is slightly below 5 million
> people, not counting satellite cities and suburbs (which, if counted,
> would contribute
Peace,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 1:53 AM Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> >> Please be advised that the set of IPv4 blocks listed below appear to be
> >> squatted on at the present time, with the apparent aid and assistance of
> >> AS44050 -- "Petersburg Internet Network Ltd." (Russia) and also AS58552
First of: Congrats and thank you Ronald for this work.
What makes me a bit sad is, that posting this here immediately starts a
discussion about what is expected behavior on these lists, rather than
how we could combat abuse more efficiently.
It seems a seeminglu, to me at least, humorous remark,
In message
=?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=B6ma_Gavrichenkov?= wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:09 AM Ronald F. Guilmette
> wrote:
>> Please be advised that the set of IPv4 blocks listed below appear to be
>> squatted on at the present time, with the apparent aid and assistance of
>> AS44050 -- "Petersburg
In message , Brian Nisbet wrote:
>However I suspect that X-posting to a list like apnic-talk may not be the
>wisest idea, given the different populations etc...
It is among my fondest hopes that cybercriminals of all stripes, and
particularly the ones who squat on IPv4 space that doesn't belong
Peace,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:09 AM Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> Please be advised that the set of IPv4 blocks listed below appear to be
> squatted on at the present time, with the apparent aid and assistance of
> AS44050 -- "Petersburg Internet Network Ltd." (Russia) and also AS58552 --
>
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Ronald F.
Guilmette
Sent: Tuesday 1 December 2020 05:12
To: apnic-t...@lists.apnic.net ;
anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] IPv4 squatting -- Courtesy of AS44050, AS58552
CAUTION[External]: This email originated from
On Mon 30/Nov/2020 22:56:22 +0100 John Levine wrote:
In article ,
Richard Clayton wrote:
Only a few of them are listed on https://www.spamhaus.org/drop/
So announcing a prefix that is on that list is not a good sign (indeed
far from it) -- but don't expect a "new" hijacker to only choose
In message , Randy Bush wrote:
>> Amongst the greatest mysteries of the shady underbelly of the
>> internet: how to pronounce "Guilmette"
>
>speaking of anti-abuse; back in the '80s we agreed that making fun of
>others' typos, misspellings, personal names, etc. was impolite.
I do not believe
> Amongst the greatest mysteries of the shady underbelly of the
> internet: how to pronounce "Guilmette"
speaking of anti-abuse; back in the '80s we agreed that making fun of
others' typos, misspellings, personal names, etc. was impolite.
randy
Amongst the greatest mysteries of the shady underbelly of the internet:
how to pronounce "Guilmette"
--
In article ,
Richard Clayton wrote:
>>Only a few of them are listed on https://www.spamhaus.org/drop/
>So announcing a prefix that is on that list is not a good sign (indeed
>far from it) -- but don't expect a "new" hijacker to only choose from
>that list or indeed to pick any prefixes from that
In message , Alessandro
Vesely writes
>> These blocks appear to be mostly or entirely very old "legacy" block,
>> primarily from the ARIN region.
>
>
>Only a few of them are listed on https://www.spamhaus.org/drop/
Spamhaus have built that table from what they know of previous hijacking
events
In message ,
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>Only a few of them are listed on https://www.spamhaus.org/drop/
I have some hope and faith that that state of affairs will be rectified
in due course, and likely before too long, now that I have shared this
info widely.
Regards,
rfg
On 30/11/2020 08:08, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Please be advised that the set of IPv4 blocks listed below appear to be
squatted on at the present time, with the apparent aid and assistance of
AS44050 -- "Petersburg Internet Network Ltd." (Russia) and also AS58552 --
"PT Multidata Rancana Prima"
Am 30.11.2020 09:15, schrieb Eileen Morris-Ross via anti-abuse-wg:
What the hell is all that crap about
As far as I understand (I'm not a routing expert at all) it's about
network abuse by hijacking ip ranges without having actual ownership for
the given network blocks.
An AS registered
What the hell is all that crap about
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 7:09, Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote: Please be advised that the set of IPv4 blocks listed below appear to be
squatted on at the present time, with the apparent aid and assistance of
AS44050 --
Please be advised that the set of IPv4 blocks listed below appear to be
squatted on at the present time, with the apparent aid and assistance of
AS44050 -- "Petersburg Internet Network Ltd." (Russia) and also AS58552 --
"PT Multidata Rancana Prima" (Indonesia).
These blocks appear to be mostly or
27 matches
Mail list logo
