Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

Hi Suresh, > All I am asking is that cobblers stick to their last. People with > backgrounds in routing and networking are not necessarily the people > in their organizations that handle abuse issues. As I'm sure you're aware, the RIPE working groups are open to all (regardless of any organisatio

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Someone on this list has been hacked

Hi Hans-Martin, > looks like someone on this list had their PC and/or mailbox hacked, I got a > "reply" to one of my mails trying to make me open some link (probably > malware). This stuff is pretty common, but it feels a bit weird that it > happened through someone who's active in anti-abuse a

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Abusive behavior by Google Inc

> so... exam...@gmail.com sends an email to mich...@blacknight.com > > who bounces - "no such user" > > Gmail sends bounce to exam...@gmail.com --- blacknight.com -- technical > read error / technical failure blacknight.com Isn't this more likely to be a bug or a mishandled error rather than mal

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse

> When anyone commits fraud to obtain a resource from RIPE, RIPE has the > responsibility to file criminal charges against that criminal. > > I am not saying that I think RIPE should file criminal charges, I am > saying that not doing so is in itself a questionable action. Well, to be pedantic, *

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity

Hi, The presumed draft you're unhappy about (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vixie-dns-rpz/) is informational. It is not a standard. not yet a standard. operational word, I guess, is yet. so there is still time to create awareness and to speak out. More than that, it hasn't yet been a

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 63, Issue 12

Marilson, > How do you know what I wrote considering that my message about "Why SPAM > exists" has not been published? If so, why did not I get it in my mail? Either we are all exceptionally good at extra-sensory perception, or your emails are coming through to the list. However, you appear to

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Status of Proposal 2017-02

Hi, “Name”, > and when does the outcome become decided? As the young lad said, he’d get back to the WG with the decision about whether consensus has been reached at the end of the review phase this week. The remaining timetable is described here: