Greetings!

On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 19:02 -0400, Kunal Sawlani wrote:
> Hi, 
> Thanks to both of you, I have something which works now. However, I am
> running into a slight issue, where the parser complaints that ANYTHING
> is not defined, in case of the grammar Jim suggested, and for John's
> grammar, it complaints that TEXTNODE is not defined. I tried defining
> these using Fragment, but to no avail. Also, I am using a combined
> grammar, and will splitting it into a lexer and parser be necessary?


In the complete and tested example that I posted there are 2 tokens:
ANYTHING and TEXTINPUT. TEXTINPUT is defined in a tokens {} option block
near the top of the file.

As an aside, why did you expect a TEXTNODE token?

In any case, you should be able to run my example through the
org.antlr.Tool, compile the resultant .java files, execute the parser,
and then observe the results.





List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"il-antlr-interest" group.
To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.

Reply via email to