ST4 is *tremendously* faster than ST3 and includes the most useful debugger for any template engine I've seen to date. For a new application, it's not even a question IMO - definitely ST4.
Sam -----Original Message----- From: antlr-interest-boun...@antlr.org [mailto:antlr-interest-boun...@antlr.org] On Behalf Of The Researcher Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 9:26 AM To: antlr-interest@antlr.org Subject: [antlr-interest] Which to use StringTempates version 3 or 4? I have the lexing, parsing and tree rewriting completed and will now be doing a proof of concept for the next phase to see if StringTemplates will work as expected. This will be my first use of StringTemplates. Since ST4 is so new and is not documented in the books, should I start with ST3 or jump into ST4? Thanks, Eric List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
