Ok Jim, let me understand if I'm missing something with a short example.
Take this little section of the grammar
parameter_with_index
: parameterName = 'PARAM_' parameterIndex '=' numericLiteral
;
It shall be changed to
parameter_with_index
: parameterNameLiteral parameterIndex
Hi all/Sam,
While using the CSharp3 target on a composite grammar, I came across a few
issues regarding rule visibility.
If no modifier (private, protected, public, ...) is specified for a rule, the
Java target generates public methods (since it is not implemented IIRC) and the
CSharp3 target
Hi Ranco,
I'll add a simple delegate grammar example to the tests I use here and find
a way to make it work. :)
If you are using Visual Studio (or MSBuild in particular, which is the
standard VS build system), then you'll definitely want to use the C# port of
the tool. I highly recommend this
On 03/23/2011 05:41 AM, maulattu wrote:
Ok Jim, let me understand if I'm missing something with a short example.
Take this little section of the grammar
parameter_with_index
: parameterName = 'PARAM_' parameterIndex '=' numericLiteral
;
It shall be changed to
On 03/23/2011 08:41 AM, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote:
On 3/23/11 1:54 AM, Jim Idle j...@temporal-wave.com wrote:
Hi Jim,
You can do it the same way in v3, but when you generate the code, ANTLR
will make up token names and you won't be able to write a good error
display routine/handler because
Hi,
Right, with debugger and minor changes. Thanks a lot.
Regards
Le 22 mars 11 à 17:07, Jim Idle a écrit :
Use the debugger, not the interpreter, then if it does not work you
can
find out why. It might well be just the interpreter that cannot run
that
grammar.
Jim
-Original
Gary,
-Original Message-
From: antlr-interest-boun...@antlr.org [mailto:antlr-interest-
boun...@antlr.org] On Behalf Of Gary Miller
- The ability to have actions on the right side of an ast re-write
operator.
r: ( alt - ^(X alt) ) {action} ;
- A different rule @init that only
On 3/23/11 4:37 PM, Kevin J. Cummings cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net wrote:
You can do it the same way in v3, but when you generate the code, ANTLR
will make up token names and you won't be able to write a good error
display routine/handler because you won't know the tokens. You will just
have
Hi,
Working on this problem for two days and I don`t seem to be any closer than
where I started.
I have defined a combination of reserved words in grammar something like
//grammar
| ‘ip’ ‘route’ call_parser_method
| ‘some’ do_something_else
But when a parser encounters a line “some other
Jim,
I have a question regarding your comment on case insensitivity. I have
been using the slowest case insensitive lexer technique, as this is
the first I have seen a viable alternative (on the page that you linked
to). The grammar I am working with is a bit strange in that all of the
Check the article as it should tell you this, but it is only the MATCH
that is done in uppercase, and the text for the tokens is taken directly
from the input stream. As you only have a single character to test and not
two for every character position, the lexer is smaller and should be
faster
Maybe this is ANTLR Works doing this, but every time code is generated, the
full file path to my grammar file is displayed in comments throughout the
entire file (i.e. // dir/dir/file.g put in like 50 different places all over
the class definition). I find this both a security and privacy issue if
Copy the code gen template and take those pieces out.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: antlr-interest-boun...@antlr.org [mailto:antlr-interest-
boun...@antlr.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Cherry
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 10:39 AM
To: antlr-interest
Subject: [antlr-interest] Code
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Jim Idle j...@temporal-wave.com wrote:
Copy the code gen template and take those pieces out.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: antlr-interest-boun...@antlr.org [mailto:antlr-interest-
boun...@antlr.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Cherry
Sent: Wednesday,
If your OS HAS symbolic links.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: antlr-interest-boun...@antlr.org [mailto:antlr-interest-
boun...@antlr.org] On Behalf Of The Researcher
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:22 AM
To: antlr-interest@antlr.org
Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] Code Generation
Hey Jim,
- The ability to have actions on the right side of an ast re-write
operator.
r: ( alt - ^(X alt) ) {action} ;
Thanks, I don't recall seeing this anywhere else.
Do you use it often? Or is a bad form?
- A different rule @init that only executes during when not
backtracking.
- The
Terence~
Better location management.
Tokens and Trees should both have methods for:
getStartLine()
getEndLine()
getStartCharPosition()
getEndCharPosition()
Trees should base them on the tokens that they include. Synthetic
tokens should get them from the original token or the full production
Thanks Jim. It worked. :)
Appreciate your help.
Hiten
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
il-antlr-interest
It works !!!
Appreciate your help.
Hiten
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
il-antlr-interest group.
To
19 matches
Mail list logo
