It turns out the code to put the clob into the datebase was incorrect
The call was
db_dml update_trans {
update bv_transactions
set transaction = :xml
where transaction_id = :transaction_id
returning transaction into :1
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
> I've objectified the nsv_* interface and have posted a note on this list
> for about couple of months ago. Well, nobody seemed interested.
I would be interested! I'm working on my first C module, but I haven't
had the time to read up on this. Besides your code, is there
Bugs item #422181, was updated on 2001-05-07 18:54
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=103152&aid=422181&group_id=3152
Category: Other: Feature Request
>Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
>Priority: 1
Submitted By: Jim Lynch (jwl)
Assigned to: N
Hi !
I've objectified the nsv_* interface and have posted a note on this list
for about couple of months ago. Well, nobody seemed interested.
In the meantime, I've done the same for keyl* commands and
significantly expanded the nsv_* interface functionality. Now you can
do much more with it and
Kris,
What is the time frame within which you are looking for this to be
completed?
Kevin
On 2001.05.08, Peter Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If in C I open a socket within one thread, is it safe to access that socket
> from other threads (assuming that I take care to put a mutex around such
> shared access)?
Depends on what you're connecting to on the other end. Does it make
se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
I'm writing an Aolserver module in C that needs to maintain links to a number
of different systems, and I've got a quick question regarding threads.
If in C I open a socket within one thread, is it safe to access that socket
from other thread
