You want to end up using qmail.
We sometimes have to send millions of emails every week (not spam), and
sendmail simply cannot handle the volume that a out of the box qmail
configuration can. Nothing is as beautiful as seeing qmail
simultaneously send 256 emails.
- Ericson Smith
On Mon, 2002-11-
On Monday, November 18, 2002, at 06:11 PM, Gabriel Ricard wrote:
(I don't really want to touch sendmail at all - too wary of security
issues).
Cut that out! Sendmail has no active security issues, and hasn't had a
live exploit in at least five years. There are reasons you may want to
avoid s
On Monday, November 18, 2002, at 06:04 PM, Steve Manning wrote:
Have you read the 'bat' book for SendMail? - it'll give you an idea of
the complexities of address rewriting.
In all fairness, sendmail's address rewriting capabilities date to a time
before TCP/IP was the lingua franca, and addres
> On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 22:16, Gabriel Ricard wrote:
>>
>>
>> Or am I just nuts?
>>
>> - Gabriel
>
> I'd go with nuts :o)
Ok, so maybe I am a little nuts. But I really want the integration I'd have
if AOLServer could just handle all of my mail as well. I know it's a PITA to
develop an MTA, but I'm
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 22:16, Gabriel Ricard wrote:
>
>
> Or am I just nuts?
>
> - Gabriel
I'd go with nuts :o)
Have you read the 'bat' book for SendMail? - it'll give you an idea of
the complexities of address rewriting.
Also, don't forget that its easier to upset a wider audience with a mail
se
+-- On Nov 18, Gabriel Ricard said:
> Or am I just nuts?
You'd be nuts to pursue this path without at least trying other mail
servers. I recommend qmail.
Gabriel Ricard writes:
Ok, this may be a totally crazy idea that's completely unnecessary, but here
it goes:
I want to have a high performance mail server that's easy to configure for
use in our system at work.
Now, thinking about it,
that's exactly what AOLServer does for HTTP traffic, so wh
On Monday, November 18, 2002, at 05:16 PM, Gabriel Ricard wrote:
So, has this been done already? Or even thought of? Is it possible?
Primehost used to have a module that would speak rudimentary SMTP, but it
would mostly forward messages on to a delivery hub. I doubt the code
would work in 3.x
Gabriel Ricard wrote:
Ok, this may be a totally crazy idea that's completely unnecessary, but here
it goes:
It's necessary - I've never seen any smtpd that would have Tcl embedded
:( Exim has Perl. We should have Tcl! :-)
I want to have a high performance mail server that's easy to configure f
Ok, this may be a totally crazy idea that's completely unnecessary, but here
it goes:
I want to have a high performance mail server that's easy to configure for
use in our system at work. Currently we're bound to apache/php and such and
our mail server is Exim. Exim is a great mailserver, but it's
Yeah!!!
Woo hoo!!!
Voting rocks!!!
Don't forget to vote for your favorite community representatives!!! Remember to send your top four picks directly to me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and not the listserv. The voting booth closes before the chat this Thursday.
As of right now, I've received 32 out of
Dossy
I'd be interested to understand how your running Wikit on AOLServer.
Just last Friday I installed it on our intranet but its running as cgi
with tclkit and a shell script launcher.
Interestingly, I couldn't find a native AOLServer Wiki implementation. I
might try and put one together if I g
Ok, now it works:
I had gmake 3.79 and upgraded to 3.80. Compiled and installed fine with 3.80. Now I just need to configure and tweak. Thanks for everyone's help. :)
-Jonathan
In a message dated 11/15/02 10:30:54 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:38
I was wondering who would be the first to send their vote to the listserv.
Careful, folks! :)
-- michael
_
michael richman
princ software engineer
aol technologies
214.442.6048
Oops
.. and I don't even live in Florida.
Hi
Nathan! These are six very strong-looking candidates - I wouldn't reject
any of them. But we have to choose, so here goes:
Dossy ShiobaraJeff HobbsScott GoodwinTom
Jackson
On 2002.11.16, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 15 November 2002 21:31, you wrote:
> > Someone pointed out that there was a new-and-improved WiKit available
> > (now as a Starkit!) and so I spent the day upgrading to it and carrying
> > over all my customizations into it.
>
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
