Everyone,
I'd like to change the required version of autoconf required --
currently, AOLserver configure.in works with autoconf 2.13, but I'd like
to move to configure.ac and autoconf 2.50+.
Does anyone have any issues with this?
-- Dossy
--
Dossy Shiobara mail: [EMAIL
Hi all,
Yesterday I moved a site from version 3.3+ad 13 of aolserver to 4. I
had initially installed the nsopenssl beta and it had been working
fine, so I left it in. However, about 11 pm last night it started
spewing
[20/Jul/2004:23:58:45][7246.7176][-conn:live-nybooks::4] Debug:
Send(55):
On Jul 21, 2004, at 7:21 AM, Janine Sisk wrote:
For now, I will switch to a release version of nsopenssl (2).
I take that back... version 2 obviously isn't meant to work with
AOLserver 4, since I'm getting the same compile error I got from the
cybercash module.
Ok... any suggestions? I'll see if
Many relatively old (but not ancient) Linux distributions ship with
autoconf 2.13 such as RedHat 7.2, 7,3 and AS 2.1. Upgrading isn't
particularly painful but many only like using official rpms and AFAIK
RedHat does not provide them.
What is the advantage of upgrade?
rob
Dossy wrote:
Everyone,
I'd
On 2004.07.20, Nathaniel Haggard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you mean nsd/config.c? I cannot find a file called config.tcl in
the aolserver source tree. I replaced CONST with CONST84 and I get
this error:
Just for everyone else's sake: the problem was Nate had another version
of Tcl
On 2004.07.21, Rob Crittenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many relatively old (but not ancient) Linux distributions ship with
autoconf 2.13 such as RedHat 7.2, 7,3 and AS 2.1. Upgrading isn't
particularly painful but many only like using official rpms and AFAIK
RedHat does not provide them.
On 2004.07.21, Janine Sisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok... any suggestions? I'll see if I can reproduce the error.
If you can reproduce the error, I will definitely make time to look into
it.
This is
obviously critical functionality for an e-commerce site, but if I have
to go back to 3.3 I'm
On Jul 21, 2004, at 10:24 AM, Dossy wrote:
On 2004.07.21, Janine Sisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok... any suggestions? I'll see if I can reproduce the error.
If you can reproduce the error, I will definitely make time to look
into
it.
I was able to reproduce it, but only loosely - shortly after
Dossy wrote:
I'd like to change the required version of autoconf required --
currently, AOLserver configure.in works with autoconf 2.13, but I'd like
to move to configure.ac and autoconf 2.50+.
Does anyone have any issues with this?
Note that the Tcl core made the move to 2.50+ in 8.5 (the dev
We also experienced similar problems with AOLserver and nsopenssl 3.x, I've
been meaning to investigate farther.
For us, nsopenssl would go into an infinite loop. I was never able to
trigger it myself, but it happened on a fairly regular basis. The culprit
seemed to be OpenSSLProc in
At Wednesday 07:23 AM 7/21/2004, you wrote:
On 2004.07.21, Rob Crittenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many relatively old (but not ancient) Linux distributions ship with
autoconf 2.13 such as RedHat 7.2, 7,3 and AS 2.1. Upgrading isn't
particularly painful but many only like using official rpms
On 2004.07.21, Janine Sisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, I think this will be very difficult to work on because
it probably has something to do with our use of the ancient cybercash
module.
Is it worth re-implementing the Cybercash module? It probably wouldn't
take more than 2-3
On 2004.07.21, Jeff Hobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that the Tcl core made the move to 2.50+ in 8.5 (the dev head).
This is another reason to upgrade AOLserver to use autoconf 2.50+ --
since AOLserver's build uses Tcl's build as a basis, until we switch
AOLserver to use autoconf 2.50+, we
Note that the Tcl core made the move to 2.50+ in 8.5 (the dev head).
This is another reason to upgrade AOLserver to use autoconf
2.50+ -- since AOLserver's build uses Tcl's build as a basis,
until we switch AOLserver to use autoconf 2.50+, we may not
be able to build AOLserver against Tcl
On 2004.07.21, John Caruso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.redhat.com/swr/noarch/autoconf-2.57-3.noarch.html
That's a RedHat 9 RPM, not an Advanced Server 2.1 RPM.
Excuse my RedHat ignorance, but could you explain the difference? Will
this RPM not install on RHAS 2.1 at all? Is it
I just discovered a site doing this old thing, where the error log is
full of
[21/Jul/2004:14:53:19][24118.8192][-main-] Fatal: unix: kill(1235, 15)
failed: 'Operation not permitted'
It happens when I go to restart the site (via daemontools) but the
pidfile has the wrong number in it.
Since it has
On 2004.07.21, Jeff Hobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see why that's an issue really - only if you ever need
to regenerate the core Tcl stuff. It comes with a ready-made
configure that should work for AOLServer build variants.
At some point, AOLserver's build was relying on Tcl source.
AOLserver's configure script has an --{enable,disable}-shared arg which
as far as I can tell is pointless. AOLserver builds shared or
static based on how Tcl was built and REFUSES to build unless it
matches.
In other words: if Tcl is built shared, AOLserver must also be. If Tcl
is built static,
AOLserver's configure script has an --{enable,disable}-shared
arg which as far as I can tell is pointless. AOLserver
builds shared or static based on how Tcl was built and
REFUSES to build unless it matches.
In other words: if Tcl is built shared, AOLserver must also
be. If Tcl is built
On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 14:59 -0400, Janine Sisk wrote:
I just discovered a site doing this old thing, where the error log is
full of
[21/Jul/2004:14:53:19][24118.8192][-main-] Fatal: unix: kill(1235, 15)
failed: 'Operation not permitted'
what uid/gid owns the pid file? is it possible
On Wednesday 21 July 2004 21:43, you wrote:
So, what's the point of presenting the option? Is it (or rather, should
it be) possible to build a statically linked AOLserver against a shared
Tcl or vice versa?
One point is, if you ever get to mem-debug the nsd executable
with Purify, you would
At Wednesday 11:40 AM 7/21/2004, you wrote:
On 2004.07.21, John Caruso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.redhat.com/swr/noarch/autoconf-2.57-3.noarch.html
That's a RedHat 9 RPM, not an Advanced Server 2.1 RPM.
Excuse my RedHat ignorance, but could you explain the difference?
RedHat split
On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 19:22, Dossy wrote:
That's interesting -- IS anyone else using the Cybercash module today?
-- Dossy
Dossy, Janine
>From the other perspective I've been using linux, aols 4.0r2, nsopenssl 3beta17 and now more recently 3beta21 with OpenACS 5.1 and the ecommerce module
On Wednesday 21 July 2004 14:40, Dossy wrote:
On 2004.07.21, John Caruso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.redhat.com/swr/noarch/autoconf-2.57-3.noarch.html
That's a RedHat 9 RPM, not an Advanced Server 2.1 RPM.
Excuse my RedHat ignorance, but could you explain the difference? Will
24 matches
Mail list logo
