In a message dated 5/28/05 11:37:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3. Use the package interface along with ns_ictl to manage state clearly, e.g., replace the confusing code in bin/init.tcl with the following and expect folks to own this config for their own install as they do with nsd.tcl:
ns_ic
On Saturday 28 May 2005 08:14, Jim Davidson wrote:
> 5. Finally, the last thing we should consider is giving up on virtual
> servers. It turns out that there is still quite a bit of code complexity
> to support virtual servers and more importantly it confuses the "process"
> init with "server"
Howdy,
I've been following this thread the last few days -- great discussion. Let me add a few points and suggest how we can move forward.
First, I'm responsible for the current approach of initializing Tcl interps in AOLserver and I agree with Zoran -- it's clumsy. Aside from failure on my
Am 27.05.2005 um 00:47 schrieb Jeff Hobbs:
This I will disagree with. If you can handle it all in C,
I think you will save time. A lot will be in the copying
itself, but saving any and all parsing is a bonus.
Hmmm...since the scripts will have to jump interp/thread,
they need to be re-parse
