On 6/2/06, William Scott Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For the most part, this just means that we need to change
the style sheet and use Company X's URL instead of our own.
What I'm leaning toward doing is
grabbing the Host from the HTTP headers and using that to dictate
which style sheet
Hi all!
I'm hoping to get some advice from the community on whether something
I want to do is possible and/or appropriate. For one of my projects,
I have a system that is basically glorified online store on which our
clients can sell their goods. Many of our clients are now asking for
us to
Guan Yang wrote:
Thanks,
What values would you suggest for NBUCKETS and MAXALLOC?
And looking at tclThreadAlloc.c, I'm not quite sure how to make the
spacing closer.
Guan
The original list is
{ 16, 1024, 512, NULL},
{ 32, 512, 256, NULL},
{ 64, 256, 128, NULL},
{
On 2006.06.02, Jeff Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm of course interested in seeing whatever variants of the threaded
> malloc that are done. The original was also provided (with thanks) by
> the folks at AOL, designed on the original mods to threaded Tcl and
> high perf malloc for it.
>
>
I'm of course interested in seeing whatever variants of the threaded malloc
that are done. The original was also provided (with thanks) by the folks at
AOL, designed on the original mods to threaded Tcl and high perf malloc for
it.
If this is all just refined improvement on the same, then it shou
Check out, or update, your code from the HEAD.
- n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thank again for your help. How could I get this fix ? Is it working ?
Herick
On Jun 2, 2006, at 3:58 PM, Jim Davidson wrote:
I just checked in the fix which is really just to disable the
configure check for pol
Hi,
Thank again for your help. How could I get this fix ? Is it working ?
Herick
On Jun 2, 2006, at 3:58 PM, Jim Davidson wrote:
I just checked in the fix which is really just to disable the
configure check for poll on OS/X, thus not setting the HAVE_POLL
cdef and defaulting to the poll em
Hi,
Dossy's right -- in 4.0 I combined the "simple" and "fancy" parsers
together and added a "safe" feature (which nobody knows or cares
about) and messed up the behavior.
So, it sounds like folks are agreed that it should simply revert to
3.x behavior in 4.5?
If so, send over a patch -
Folks,
Nate and I spent a lot of time -- frankly, far too much time --
chasing this down a few months back. We ended up completely re-
writing the multi-threaded allocator with features to reclaim memory,
fix stats counters which in the current code are broken and lie, and
added an "alloc
I just checked in the fix which is really just to disable the
configure check for poll on OS/X, thus not setting the HAVE_POLL cdef
and defaulting to the poll emulation code used on OS/X in the past.
So, update, re-config, and rebuild -- should work now.
For those curious, it appears that
Thanks,
What values would you suggest for NBUCKETS and MAXALLOC?
And looking at tclThreadAlloc.c, I'm not quite sure how to make the
spacing closer.
Guan
On 2 Jun 2006, at 19:28 , Jeff Rogers wrote:
I think one difference is in the tcl version itself; the latest
versions use a fast mul
I think one difference is in the tcl version itself; the latest
versions use a fast multithreaded allocator that allocates on average
slightly more than double the amount requestes, while earlier versions
may have been more frugal. You can cut your memory usage by a third or
more by increasin
Hi,
A couple of weeks ago I moved a number of servers to AOLserver 4.0.10
from various versions of 3.4 because of the 10^9 seconds problem.
After the move servers that were preivously using 100-120 MB of
memory are now using around 300 MB to 400 MB each.
I've tried to turn off or reduce a
13 matches
Mail list logo
