Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver 4.x ADP parser

2005-08-25 Thread Alastair N. Young
] AOLserver 4.x ADP parser On Aug 23 06:17:22PM, Jim Davidson wrote: Hi, Jeremy: Can you update the patch to work against the HEAD branch? Sure, I'll look into it later this week. - Jeremy -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL

Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver 4.x ADP parser

2005-08-23 Thread Jim Davidson
Hi, The patch would need to be updated as the underlying code has changed. Otherwise, I'm inclined to just restore the previous behavior unless I'm missing something. Does anyone have a reason why the new behavior is preferred to the old or was this all just something I screwed up

Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver 4.x ADP parser

2005-08-18 Thread Alastair Young
I am working on upgrading our systems to Aolserver 4.x and have run into the issue below. We have a whole boatload of code that has % % tags embedded within registered tags. I did not see any response to the post below. What is the story on this? Alastair Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, 18

[AOLSERVER] AOLserver 4.x ADP parser

2004-09-18 Thread Jeremy Collins
In testing our application on AS 4.x I noticed that the new ADP parser gives precedence to % % tags before registered tags. For example: if foo def % ns_adp_puts i'm here but you can't see me % /if Obviously if would be a registered tag. Now if you run this the output is this: if foo def i'm