So Bob, what is the difference between setting the variable within the
adp and setting it in a procedure? Surely the variable set in the
procedure should be available as the procedure is called within the
adp.
Tom, what templating system do you use? How do you use it? any links
for a noob like
On 20/04/2008, at 7:18 PM, Xavier Bourguignon wrote:
So Bob, what is the difference between setting the variable within the
adp and setting it in a procedure? Surely the variable set in the
procedure should be available as the procedure is called within the
adp.
It's all about scope! A variable
On Apr 20, 2008, at 2:48 AM, Xavier Bourguignon wrote:
So Bob, what is the difference between setting the variable within the
adp and setting it in a procedure?
Local variables within a procedure are ... local.
This is basic - what's your programming background?
Surely the variable set in
Xavier,
Here is a link to the templating system, right now it is part of a larger
toolkit:
http://junom.com/twt/tic-tac-toe/
The README explains the basics, plus explains what files to look at for
examples. Basically:
.tcl files -- click and see the result of running the tcl file and then
On Sunday 20 April 2008 04:47, Bas Scheffers wrote:
More information on scope here: http://wiki.tcl.tk/11921
In general, creating variables inside a procedure and then using
global or upvar/uplevel to make them available once the procedure
returns is pretty bad form.
It might be more exact
On 2008.04.20, Xavier Bourguignon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Bob, what is the difference between setting the variable within the
adp and setting it in a procedure? Surely the variable set in the
procedure should be available as the procedure is called within the
adp.
Xavier,
I suggest you
Tom, Robert, Bas, Dossy,
Thank you all for the input, all very constructive and useful, it has
helped me a lot.
Don, my programming background has nothing to do with the questions I
asked, so sorry, you won't get an answer from me, but thank you for
trying.
On 20/04/2008, Dossy Shiobara [EMAIL
On Apr 20, 2008, at 11:20 AM, Xavier Bourguignon wrote:
Don, my programming background has nothing to do with the questions I
asked, so sorry, you won't get an answer from me, but thank you for
trying.
I asked because more information about your knowledge and skills can
help us answer you
Hello Don,
the way you asked was to me very offensive, you are right.
It is so great knowing I won't get any more nasty comments from you.
Thanks for putting my mind at rest concerning this issue.
Yours sincerely.
On 20/04/2008, Don Baccus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 20, 2008, at 11:20
On Apr 20, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Xavier Bourguignon wrote:
It is so great knowing I won't get any more nasty comments from you.
I wasn't trying to be nasty, and I'm sorry you took it that way, but I
have to say, after my taking the time to explain why I asked about
your level of programming
ooops, and another nasty comment.
and apparently I am the one not being civil.
On 20/04/2008, Don Baccus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 20, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Xavier Bourguignon wrote:
It is so great knowing I won't get any more nasty comments from you.
I wasn't trying to be nasty,
Don, we all know you, but strangers don't, so, a bit more restraint on
the name calling, please.
Xavier, you're new here, and frankly, you're not presenting yourself
in the best light. I politely suggest you reconsider your approach.
Now for a few semi-gratuitous comments of my own:
On Sun,
On Sunday 20 April 2008 15:48, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 07:20:58PM +0100, Xavier Bourguignon wrote:
Don, my programming background has nothing to do with the questions I
asked, so sorry, you won't get an answer from me, but thank you for
trying.
Not true, your
13 matches
Mail list logo
