On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 08:50:21PM -0400, John Sequeira wrote:
Would xotcl's xoStore help you out? It's more ORM than OODBMS, but
I'd never heard of it, thanks, I'll take a look.
Also, I'm curious ... what type of data would you want to store that
wouldn't fit in an array?
In my
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 13:48, you wrote:
In my particular (peculiar?) experience, I wrote a multi-threaded
application for fetching remote data via a pretty low-level, rather
ugly, proprietary C API. (I used AOLserver for its excellent
mult-threaded C and Tcl programming environment; if
I think Solid has versions of their database server that:
- can be loaded directly with the application; no separate process
- are thread-safe
- have support for in-memory tables
http://www.solidtech.com
Good luck!
Jim
I don't intend to go back and change that particular application now,
and
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 02:08:23PM +0200, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
Just a thought... Have you checked out the excellent MetaKit
from Jean-Claude Wippler? It is quite powerful and popular
Just like SQLlite, MetaKit does not allow concurrent writers in any
form. Therefore, it is not directly
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 13:48, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 08:50:21PM -0400, John Sequeira wrote:
Would xotcl's xoStore help you out? It's more ORM than OODBMS, but
I'd never heard of it, thanks, I'll take a look.
xoStore is a persistence layer for xotcl objects
What about mysql's heap tables?
http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mysql/article.php/3077531
I don't know if that would do what you want, but if so would eliminate
needing another layer of software.
I'm also not sure if postgresql has something similar.
Again like SQLlite, MetaKit might
AOLserver's nsv API is great, but I've occasionally found the plain
old key/value pairs of an associative arrays limiting, and really
wished I had an in-memory relational database available. So I'm
wondering if Mnesia would fit that bill..
I know nothing about Mnesia, but for in-memory dbs
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:00:41AM -0700, Jeff Hobbs wrote:
I know nothing about Mnesia, but for in-memory dbs you might want to
consider sqlite (http://www.sqlite.org/). It is threadsafe, when
Last I checked, Sqllite does not support concurrency. (It allows at
best one exclusive writer,
snip
nsv, on the other hand, nicely supports concurrent access from
multiple theads (and the Tcl threads extensions even more so). I want
something clearly more powerful than nsv, not something which better
in some ways but dramatically worse in at least one major, important
way
Would xotcl's
