Re: [AOLSERVER] Win32 binaries (testing only!) available for download.

2004-07-23 Thread Bas Scheffers
Dossy Shiobara said: I haven't tested with the commercial MSVC++ 6.0, only the new Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003 compiler. So it really is free (as in money wise), I didn't realise! That's good enough then, if they ever stop handing it out for free, there is always the possibility to switch.

Re: [AOLSERVER] Possible problem with nsopenssl3 beta

2004-07-23 Thread Janine Sisk
Dossy, was Jamie's report helpful? If you think it's the same problem then the cybercash module probably isn't implicated after all. Is this something you plan to work on? I am not familiar enough with AOLserver internals to help much, but I seem to have a pretty reliable setup for reproducing

Re: [AOLSERVER] Possible problem with nsopenssl3 beta

2004-07-23 Thread Dossy Shiobara
On 2004.07.23, Janine Sisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dossy, was Jamie's report helpful? It might be helpful, but I also think describes a problem that's fixed in the more recent nsopenssl3 betas -- Jamie wasn't specific as to which particular beta they saw this problem with. What version of

Re: [AOLSERVER] Possible problem with nsopenssl3 beta

2004-07-23 Thread Janine Sisk
This was nsopenssl beta 17, the latest on Scott's site. AOLserver 4.0.5 (haven't had time to upgrade since 6 7 came out). It's a slightly older version of RedHat Linux, I *think* it's RH 8 but will have to find out for sure. I know it is up-to-date on all of it's patches. Anything else you

Re: [AOLSERVER] Possible problem with nsopenssl3 beta

2004-07-23 Thread Dossy Shiobara
On 2004.07.23, Janine Sisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This was nsopenssl beta 17, the latest on Scott's site. AOLserver 4.0.5 (haven't had time to upgrade since 6 7 came out). It's a slightly older version of RedHat Linux, I *think* it's RH 8 but will have to find out for sure. I know it is

Re: [AOLSERVER] Win32 binaries (testing only!) available for download.

2004-07-23 Thread Ramesh Venkitaswaran
I built Tcl 8.4.6 and AOLserver 4.1.0 (CVS HEAD) and AOLserver 4.0.7. I Where can I find what's changed between 4.0.7 and 4.1.0 ? I was wondering whether 4.1.0 contains any features or fixes that would make it worth upgrading to? I'm currently running 4.0.5 on windows. A quick update on the

[AOLSERVER] aolserver/php

2004-07-23 Thread Noah Robin
So, in the interest of science (and probably masochism) I compiled PHP 4.3.8 (with the aolserver.c patch from panoptic) against aolserver 3.5.10 and 4.0.7 last night, and ran some load tests. Result: on linux 2.4.26, and the only PHP configure option was --with-aolserver=, I was seeing a failure

Re: [AOLSERVER] Win32 binaries (testing only!) available for download.

2004-07-23 Thread Dossy Shiobara
On 2004.07.23, Ramesh Venkitaswaran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I built Tcl 8.4.6 and AOLserver 4.1.0 (CVS HEAD) and AOLserver 4.0.7. I Where can I find what's changed between 4.0.7 and 4.1.0 ? I was wondering whether 4.1.0 contains any features or fixes that would make it worth upgrading to?

Re: [AOLSERVER] Win32 binaries (testing only!) available for download.

2004-07-23 Thread Ramesh Venkitaswaran
Awesome, thanks for the feedback! What OS are you running on your laptop, by the way? I ran into the silly inbound connection limit on my WinXP Home laptop -- very annoying. Win 2K Pro SP4. That is interesting. Since I'm doing testing on my laptop, I'm the only one who's accessing the site.

Re: [AOLSERVER] Possible problem with nsopenssl3 beta

2004-07-23 Thread Jamie Rasmussen
The version we're running has some Win32 patches and doesn't exactly match up to a particular beta, but is closest to beta 20. (Last merged ChangeLog entry was 2004-04-14 Scott Goodwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Looking at the HEAD version, I don't see anything that looks targetted at these problems.

Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver/php

2004-07-23 Thread Rob Crittenden
I haven't been able to duplicate this. I see ab reporting some errors but according to the AOLserver logs it is doing the right thing. I have zero previous experience with ab though, so a lot of this is from the hip. Part of the problem may be that PHP isn't setting a content-length header and ab

[AOLSERVER] Web Services

2004-07-23 Thread Amy Chan
Does AOL Server support web services (e.g. SOAP)? Where can I get more information on this topic? Thanks, Amy -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can

Re: [AOLSERVER] Win32 binaries (testing only!) available for download.

2004-07-23 Thread Dossy Shiobara
On 2004.07.23, Ramesh Venkitaswaran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Awesome, thanks for the feedback! What OS are you running on your laptop, by the way? I ran into the silly inbound connection limit on my WinXP Home laptop -- very annoying. Win 2K Pro SP4. That is interesting. Since I'm doing

Re: [AOLSERVER] Possible problem with nsopenssl3 beta

2004-07-23 Thread Janine Sisk
On Jul 23, 2004, at 11:35 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote: No, this is a good start. AOLserver 4.0.5 should be okay, but you definitely want to use the most current nsopenssl beta, which is currentl v3_0beta21 in CVS. Doh! I had no idea I wasn't using the latest code. I just automatically went to

[AOLSERVER] nssoap module

2004-07-23 Thread Amy Chan
Hi, Anyone using the nssoap module now and may know its current status? Thanks, Amy -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field

Re: [AOLSERVER] nssoap module

2004-07-23 Thread Andrew Piskorski
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 06:19:57PM -0400, Amy Chan wrote: Anyone using the nssoap module now and may know its current status? I don't know, but there are probably 5 or so different SOAP or XML-RPC packages that people have used from AOLserver. Here's an email from January giving links to

Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver/php

2004-07-23 Thread Dossy Shiobara
On 2004.07.23, Noah Robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, in the interest of science (and probably masochism) I compiled PHP 4.3.8 (with the aolserver.c patch from panoptic) against aolserver 3.5.10 and 4.0.7 last night, and ran some load tests. Result: on linux 2.4.26, and the only PHP configure

Re: [AOLSERVER] tclprof into AOLserver CVS

2004-07-23 Thread Jamie Rasmussen
I would also like to endorse putting this module into AOLserver CVS. I just tried it out to diagnose a problem page and instantly determined that one proc call was responsible for 96% of the page building time. Thank you very much Eric! It would have been a lot more painful to track that down