> 1. About the HPUX shared build problems. It definately looks
>like, although the fix in place doesn't not "fix" the
>real problem, that it allows HPUX binary builds to work
>without junking things up for everyone else, which all
>other suggested patches have d
Did anyone else test the IPv6 patch ? Preferably
on non solaris / non freebsd ?
Dw.
On 7 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> coar99/07/07 04:05:16
>
> Modified:.STATUS
> Log:
> Veto EAPI for 1.3.7 (too much confusion and controversy, esp.
> w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> coar99/07/07 04:05:16
>
> Modified:.STATUS
> Log:
> Veto EAPI for 1.3.7 (too much confusion and controversy, esp.
> with the KEAPI alternative); defer it until the next release.
> Also note some platforms I can build.
N
On 12 Mar 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> + - r->content_language is for backwards compatibility... with modules
> + that may not link any longer without some minor editing. The new
> + field is r->content_languages. Heck it's not even mentioned in
> + apache-devsite/mmn.txt
