On Apr 21, Marc Slemko wrote:
> I'm saying that the whole "docs tree is completely separate and
> disjoint from the code" argument that you are trying to make is
> bogus and is very bad for the project and for the docs themself.
Not that I really want to step in the middle of this, but I do want
t
Marc Slemko wrote:
>
> I'm afraid I am completely unable to find any reference to changing
> it so commit messages for docs only go to apache-docs before this
> message that you only sent to apache-docs.
Oh, that's the part you meant. Yes, that message should
have been Cced to new-httpd. D'oh!
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Marc Slemko wrote:
> >
> > I don't think that it is proper to decide "hey, we should change this
> > about development" and propose it on a list with only a small subset
> > of developers on it.
>
> Um, just *what* are you talking about? The
Marc Slemko wrote:
>
> I don't think that it is proper to decide "hey, we should change this
> about development" and propose it on a list with only a small subset
> of developers on it.
Um, just *what* are you talking about? The doc extraction was
discussed on new-httpd and apache-core; this me
(originally sent only to apache-docs)
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Well, the move of the Apache HTTP server documentation out of
> the code repository and into a separate area where coders and
> non-coders alike can work on it should happen to-day.
>
> One of the issues w
Well, the move of the Apache HTTP server documentation out of
the code repository and into a separate area where coders and
non-coders alike can work on it should happen to-day.
One of the issues with this is where update messages should go.
That is, when someone adds, removes, or changes a file,
