On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Rich Bowen wrote:
[...]
> So, so far as activating things, I've really just been testing
> the waters. I'd be a little nervous about having commit access,
> because I'd still want some of the real experts to look at what
> I was writing.
Well, the committ-then-review system s
unsubscribe
-Original Message-
From: cesar torres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 12:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: unsuscribe
unsuscribe
>From: "Buschiazzo Saavedra, Leonardo (Petrox)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "'[EMAIL PR
unsuscribe
From: "Buschiazzo Saavedra, Leonardo (Petrox)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: cvs commit: apache-2.0/src/include bsd_queue.h
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 12:59:41 -0400
> -Mensaje original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTEC
> -Mensaje original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: Jueves, 24 de Agosto de 2000 10:52
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: cvs commit: httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/misc FAQ-I.html
>
> coar00/08/24 08:52:02
>
> Modified:htdocs/manual
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Rich Bowen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: Lunes, 28 de Agosto de 2000 21:29
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: Re: Patch: (Docs) VirtualHost
>
> Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> > Here's something similar to what I submitted a while ago, but in more
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: Jueves, 07 de Septiembre de 2000 05:01
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: cvs commit: apache-2.0/src/include bsd_queue.h
>
> fanf00/09/07 03:01:25
>
> Added: src/include bsd_que
fanf00/09/07 04:22:50
Removed: src/include bsd_queue.h
Log:
Damn. I just worked out that since I first patched in this code we
added split() to the buckets API, which requires a Q_INSERT_AFTER
macro which doesn't depend on knowing where the head of the queue
is. None of the
fanf00/09/07 03:24:43
Modified:src/include ap_buckets.h
Log:
use the right macro names in the double-include-protection stuff
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +3 -3 apache-2.0/src/include/ap_buckets.h
Index: ap_buckets.h
=
fanf00/09/07 03:21:10
Modified:src/include ap_buckets.h
Log:
remove bogus #include "apr_private.h"
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +0 -1 apache-2.0/src/include/ap_buckets.h
Index: ap_buckets.h
fanf00/09/07 03:16:58
Modified:src/include bsd_queue.h
Log:
Throw away the macros that we don't need, and include the relevant bit
of the manual page.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +139 -427 apache-2.0/src/include/bsd_queue.h
Index: bsd_queue.h
fanf00/09/07 03:03:45
Modified:src/include bsd_queue.h
Log:
Add my concatenation macros. These have been submitted to FreeBSD. See
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=20024
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +37 -7 apache-2.0/src/include/bsd_queue.h
Inde
fanf00/09/07 03:01:25
Added: src/include bsd_queue.h
Log:
Add list/queue macros from FreeBSD for use in bucket brigades etc.
Obtained from:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/src/sys/sys/queue.h?rev=1.40&content-type=text/plain
Revision Changes
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Solutions?
> - Encourage more people from new-httpd to come hang out over here as well.
> - Give commit access to some of the people hanging out here. (That was
> the original purpose of splitting the repositories, right?)
we brought it up on a closed li
>
> Anyone else have ideas for how to "activate" this list?
I agree with your analysis. I was posting small patches in the hopes
of getting noticed, as I had some ideas for larger things.
Specifically, I'd like to contribute tutorial and HOWTO type things.
I write a weekly column for ApacheToday
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> > Just out of curiosity, am I doing something fundamentally wrong with
> > these patches, or am I sending them to the wrong place?
>
> No, you're sending them to the right place, but this list
> isn't very heavily popul
15 matches
Mail list logo
