slive 00/09/28 16:04:41
Modified:htdocs/manual/mod index.html index-bytype.html
mod_example.html
Log:
Remove compatibility info from index.
Revision ChangesPath
1.38 +10 -10httpd-docs-2.0/htdocs/manual/mod/index.html
Index: index.ht
slive 00/09/28 15:55:31
Modified:htdocs/manual/mod index.html index-bytype.html
mod_example.html
Log:
Now that we have compatibility info consistently in the module docs,
I don't see any reason to have it in the index, where it was
inconsistent, and made
slive 00/09/28 15:43:32
Modified:htdocs/manual/mod mod_negotiation.html mod_rewrite.html
mod_vhost_alias.html mod_digest.html mod_cgi.html
mod_usertrack.html mod_example.html
Log:
Last of the module style changes (I hope).
Revisi
slive 00/09/28 15:42:14
Modified:htdocs/manual/mod mod_negotiation.html mod_rewrite.html
mod_vhost_alias.html mod_digest.html mod_cgi.html
mod_usertrack.html mod_example.html
Log:
The last few modules file style changes, plus a few li
unsubscribe
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 5:54 PM
Subject: cvs commit: httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/mod mod_so.html
mod_speling.html mod_status.html mod_unique_id.html mod_userdir.html
mod_vhost_alias.html
> slive
unsubscribe
- Original Message -
From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: Order Mutual-failure
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Raymond S Brand wrote:
>
> > Please do not not delete documentation for existing directives
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Raymond S Brand wrote:
> Please do not not delete documentation for existing directives. Instead,
> annotate the existing documentation with a note that the documentor does
> not understand what and/or how the directives work. Hopefully, someone
> will read the note and correc
Please do not not delete documentation for existing directives. Instead,
annotate the existing documentation with a note that the documentor does
not understand what and/or how the directives work. Hopefully, someone
will read the note and correct the situation with better documentation
(and maybe
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> Well, if you figure out anyting, please let me know. Otherwise,
> my hand is itching towards the delete key as we speak.
Um, no deleting of documentation for existing features.
Mark it as deprecated or confusing, but don't delete it.
Actually, I had the impression that
slive 00/09/28 10:05:42
Modified:htdocs/manual/mod mod_env.html mod_include.html
mod_mime_magic.html
Log:
Style updates.
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +29 -10httpd-docs-2.0/htdocs/manual/mod/mod_env.html
Index: mod_env.html
==
slive 00/09/28 10:04:57
Modified:htdocs/manual/mod mod_env.html mod_include.html
mod_mime_magic.html
Log:
A few more style updates I missed committing.
Remarkably, I'm almost done.
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +29 -10httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs
slive 00/09/28 09:56:00
Modified:htdocs/manual/mod mod_so.html mod_speling.html
mod_status.html mod_unique_id.html mod_userdir.html
mod_vhost_alias.html
Log:
Style update.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +89 -68httpd-do
slive 00/09/28 09:54:48
Modified:htdocs/manual/mod mod_so.html mod_speling.html
mod_status.html mod_unique_id.html mod_userdir.html
mod_vhost_alias.html
Log:
Style updates.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +89 -68httpd-d
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Joshua Slive wrote:
> >
> > I've never been able to figure this out either. What the heck is
> > "Order Mutual-failure" supposed to do?
>
> Seems to me there was a good use I had for this at one point. I'll have
> to go back through my notes.
>
Well, i
trawick 00/09/28 07:59:34
Modified:src/lib/apr/include apr_thread_proc.h
Log:
Fix a few misspellings.
Revision ChangesPath
1.44 +3 -3 apache-2.0/src/lib/apr/include/apr_thread_proc.h
Index: apr_thread_proc.h
===
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> I've never been able to figure this out either. What the heck is
> "Order Mutual-failure" supposed to do?
As far as I've been able to tell, mutual-failure means that a host, in
order to be allowed, must BOTH appear on the allow list, and not appear
on the deny list. Which
Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Well, I'm tempted to nuke it from the documentation, at least.
>It confuses me, and obviously other people too.
I agree, mutual-failure is bogus.
Tony.
--
en oeccget g mtcaaf.a.n.finch
v spdlkishrhtewe y[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eatp o v eiti i d.[E
17 matches
Mail list logo