As Joshua suggested, I have separated the content changes from the
formatting changes. Listed below are the proposed content changes for the
Server Side Includes section. If they are acceptable, I will continue
working the rest of the security tips documentation, according to the
proposal outlin
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> I'm sure we can find a place. In the meanwhile, if you get a minute can I
> ask you to do me the favor of applying this change and the corresponding
> .html version at the same time?
Hmmm... Just tried to do that but it wouldn't apply cleanly and I don'
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> 1. Apply tidy with exactly the same options to
> httpd-docs-1.3 and hope that the formating is close
> enough to make things work.
+1
> 2. Abandon the 1.3 docs except for very important changes.
Not an option, I don't think. 1.3 is going to be the
more widely deployed v
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The .html version is autogenerated. (It should say that in the comments
> in the file, but I can't remember for sure.)
Ahh, so it does.
> I have a hacked-up garbage C program that does the job. I should
> probably commit it to CVS somewhere, but I
I should have brought this up before, but I forgot about the issue.
We now have a serious problem bringing forward or backward changes in the
docs. Because of the xhtml changes in the 2.0 docs, there is no longer
any way to get reasonable diffs between 1.3 and 2.0. For example, if we
commit cha
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Allan Liska wrote:
>
> I've cleaned up some of the HTML to make it more in line with the
> recommendation in the tutorials, and enhanced the section on Server Side
> Includes. If this looks okay, I will start working on some of the other
> sections outlined in my earlier pro
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> The httpd man page is a bit out of date. The default install path is
> wrong and there are a few options listed that either don't seem to exist
> anymore or have been added and are missing. Does the following look right
> to you all? Also, I know t
The httpd man page is a bit out of date. The default install path is
wrong and there are a few options listed that either don't seem to exist
anymore or have been added and are missing. Does the following look right
to you all? Also, I know that this information is duplicated in at least
one ot
Opening a new drawer in the Abominable Cabinet of Miss Files..
- Forwarded message from Steve Osterhoudt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Steve Osterhoudt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FYI
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 09:39:36 -0700
Hi,
On the page ht
- William A. Rowe, Jr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011001 14:56]:
> Sure it deserves mention. You forgot to share a critical detail, which
> version of Opera introduced MD5 support? If there is a changes log, it
> might be detailed there.
>
> We would like to include it in the list, but we would also l
From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:06 PM
> Enclosed is the patch with some words reordered according to suggestions
> made on news:hr.comp.www by Mr. "Vlatko Juric-Kokic"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied ... thank you again!
--
> -Original Message-
> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mladen, would you send me the patch as an attachment? Your mailer is
wrapping
> and foreign language files aren't fun to munge into applying :(
>
> Bill
[Mladen Turk]
Sorry for that.
Too many machines with d
Sure it deserves mention. You forgot to share a critical detail, which
version of Opera introduced MD5 support? If there is a changes log, it
might be detailed there.
We would like to include it in the list, but we would also like to assure
we've informed the user which version started supoortin
Mladen, would you send me the patch as an attachment? Your mailer is wrapping
and foreign language files aren't fun to munge into applying :(
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the right forum for this comment but I couldn't find a
better one. Apologies in advance to anyone disagreeing with my choise of forum.
Anyway. When setting up the mod_auth_digest module in an Apache 1.3.20 a few
days ago I was really surprised to se a note in the do
> I'm sure the index.html.family is several orders of magnitude better
than
> it was for Apache 2.0. Someone may want to go back and crosscheck my
2.0
> charset matches, and then dig into 1.3 and double check the HTTP-Equiv
> tags against the charset based on filesnames against httpd.conf-dist.
martin 01/10/01 01:21:44
Modified:htdocs/manual/misc rewriteguide.html
Log:
Undo the change in Rev.1.10. As Ralf pointed out, the '=' prefix
changes the Regex-Matching to a Plain-Text Matching.
Submitted by: "Ralf S. Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revision ChangesPat
From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2001 6:03 AM
> > Since Stipe Tolj (cygwin port) is the only Croatian-sound-like name I now,
> > perhaps he could check the translation. I may be wrong, but I didn't catch
> > beside Stipe no one. Well, there was a guy named Tesl
18 matches
Mail list logo
