Relevant suggestions for all apache-docco hackers :)
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Hubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 6:05 PM
Subject: RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/conf ldap.conf proxy.conf ssl.conf
httpd-std.conf httpd-win.conf
Hi folks,
I don't kno
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> [good suggestions deleted]
I forwarded it to ApacheWeek.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!"
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
> [good suggestions deleted]
>
> Of course, the person will probably never see these suggestions. It
> came from a non-subscriber who I moderated through. I guess if you
> send messages to lists you aren't subscribed to, you don't really care
> that much
> -Original Message-
> From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[good suggestions deleted]
Of course, the person will probably never see these suggestions. It came
from a non-subscriber who I moderated through. I guess if you send messages
to lists you aren't subscribed to, you d
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Arthur A Gwozdz wrote:
>
> page: http://www.apacheweek.com/features/put
>
Well, for one thing, the apacheweek site isn't under our control. You
should send this set of changes to apacheweek directly.
As far as format goes, for future reference, we ask for unified diffs as
o
page: http://www.apacheweek.com/features/put
There were several relatively inconsequential grammar or spelling errors
in
the PUT page documentation. I've corrected them and included the altered
html
below in what I believe is the desired format for updating
documentation.
Changes:
send > sent
Am
