Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/docroot index.html.en

2001-05-03 Thread Roy T. Fielding
> Conversion to XHTML. > The plan is to continue converting the rest of the docs to XHTML, so if you > have any objections, please voice them now on apache-docs. No objection to the conversion, but please remove the following line > + Useless bits don't belong in every response. Ro

Re: httpd-docs-2.0 commit message

2001-01-04 Thread Roy T. Fielding
> This is a different issue. It has been discussed several > times and needs more discussion before the final dicision. > Until then, the old behavior should be preserved. I am restoring the *original* behavior, which was that all commits are sent to the project cvs mailing list. If you want to

Re: httpd-docs-2.0 commit message

2001-01-03 Thread Roy T. Fielding
> b) You added the mapping "'httpd-2.0/docs' => 'httpd-docs-2.0');" - since > this is a new thing, I didn't implement it, unless someone who completely > understands the manipulation that Ken did with the modules file explains > that this is the correct thing to do. And it's yet more Ickyness. I

htdocs

2000-12-01 Thread Roy T. Fielding
Somewhere in between my checking all the tags (which turned out to be there after all, aside from a few files) and removing a bunch of Attic'd stuff simply because someone changed their mind on a directory name (all the files had no tags), I forgot what I was doing and made the change to httpd-docs