From: "Rich Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 6:13 AM
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >
> > while you are at it... why not create a mod_template.html file :-?
>
> OK, I'll do that. I did not think that new mod_foo came along often
> enough to warrant t
On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Rich Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 9:47 PM
> > >
> > > The directive listing should not be shoved down. If the "Summary" grows
> > > beyond a few paragraphs, then it should be split into sections and placed
> >
From: "Rich Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 9:47 PM
> >
> > The directive listing should not be shoved down. If the "Summary" grows
> > beyond a few paragraphs, then it should be split into sections and placed
> > below the directive listing. So it should be
> >
> > 1. He
On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> 2.0 now has a very nice explanation of how the automatic directory
> ordering and searching works, but there is, as far as I can find, no
> description of this behavior in the 1.3 docs. I'm writing such a
> description, and wondered where the best plac
On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> 2.0 now has a very nice explanation of how the automatic directory
> ordering and searching works, but there is, as far as I can find, no
> description of this behavior in the 1.3 docs. I'm writing such a
> description, and wondered where the best plac
2.0 now has a very nice explanation of how the automatic directory
ordering and searching works, but there is, as far as I can find, no
description of this behavior in the 1.3 docs. I'm writing such a
description, and wondered where the best place to put it would be. In
the 2.0 docs, it is stuck i
2.0 now has a very nice explanation of how the automatic directory
ordering and searching works, but there is, as far as I can find, no
description of this behavior in the 1.3 docs. I'm writing such a
description, and wondered where the best place to put it would be. In
the 2.0 docs, it is stuck in
