On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, you wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> > 2. We wait about two days to make sure eveyone has a chance to
> > read this thread and voice their opinion on conversion to XHTML.
>
> OK, here is a lurker's opinion :-)
>
> Have you considered the problems that ma
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Patrik Grip-Jansson wrote:
> OK, here is a lurker's opinion :-)
Always welcome!
>
> Have you considered the problems that may occur with older browsers that
> doesn't support XHTML? Some old browsers doesn't handle tags without
> closing tags, such as or , very gracefully.
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Joshua Slive wrote:
> 2. We wait about two days to make sure eveyone has a chance to
> read this thread and voice their opinion on conversion to XHTML.
OK, here is a lurker's opinion :-)
Have you considered the problems that may occur with older browsers that
doesn't support
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, you wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, James A Sutherland wrote:
> > OK. Since I made a start on this a while ago, I'll volunteer to make a
> > start -
> > I don't have commit access, though, so who wants to handle the patches? Or
> > can
> > I get commit access on docs? Just lowe
> Okay, here is a suggested course of action:
>
> 1. I will give a "heads-up" to the new-httpd list later today
> on the XHTML issue to make sure nobody there objects.
>
> 2. We wait about two days to make sure eveyone has a chance to
> read this thread and voice their opinion on conversion to XH
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, James A Sutherland wrote:
> OK. Since I made a start on this a while ago, I'll volunteer to make a start -
> I don't have commit access, though, so who wants to handle the patches? Or can
> I get commit access on docs? Just lowercasing the tags will generate a huge
> flood of
