unsubscribe
- Original Message -
From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: Order Mutual-failure
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Raymond S Brand wrote:
>
> > Please do not not
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Raymond S Brand wrote:
> Please do not not delete documentation for existing directives. Instead,
> annotate the existing documentation with a note that the documentor does
> not understand what and/or how the directives work. Hopefully, someone
> will read the note and correc
code).
Hidden features are a bad idea.
Raymond S Brand
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > Joshua Slive wrote:
> > >
> > > I've never been able to figure this out either. What the heck is
> > > "Or
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> Well, if you figure out anyting, please let me know. Otherwise,
> my hand is itching towards the delete key as we speak.
Um, no deleting of documentation for existing features.
Mark it as deprecated or confusing, but don't delete it.
Actually, I had the impression that
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Joshua Slive wrote:
> >
> > I've never been able to figure this out either. What the heck is
> > "Order Mutual-failure" supposed to do?
>
> Seems to me there was a good use I had for this at one point. I'
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> I've never been able to figure this out either. What the heck is
> "Order Mutual-failure" supposed to do?
As far as I've been able to tell, mutual-failure means that a host, in
order to be allowed, must BOTH appear on the allow list, an
Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Well, I'm tempted to nuke it from the documentation, at least.
>It confuses me, and obviously other people too.
I agree, mutual-failure is bogus.
Tony.
--
en oeccget g mtcaaf.a.n.finch
v spdlkishrhtewe y[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eatp o v eiti i d.[E
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Tony Finch wrote:
> Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >I've never been able to figure this out either. What the heck is
> >"Order Mutual-failure" supposed to do?
>
> Dunno. It's really old code, though, so t
Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I've never been able to figure this out either. What the heck is
>"Order Mutual-failure" supposed to do?
Dunno. It's really old code, though, so the CVS archive isn't much help.
Tony.
--
en oeccget g mtcaa
I've never been able to figure this out either. What the heck is
"Order Mutual-failure" supposed to do?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ljb)
Newsgroups: comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: Apache "Order Allow,Deny" vs "Order Mutual-failure"?
Date: 26
10 matches
Mail list logo
