On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
> According to Joshua Slive:
>
> > I still haven't actually tried this stuff on a real server, so take this
> > with a grain of salt.
>
> BTW, here are two examples of real servers to play with...
>
> http://www.cablewireless.de/ (based on version 1.
According to Joshua Slive:
> I still haven't actually tried this stuff on a real server, so take this
> with a grain of salt.
BTW, here are two examples of real servers to play with...
http://www.cablewireless.de/ (based on version 1.2, en, de, fr, us)
http://www.unix-ag.org/ (based on
From: "Lars Eilebrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 6:01 PM
> Are we now keeping the error docs in httpd-2.0 instead of httpd-docs-2.0?
> I just noticed that OtherBill moved some of the files to httpd-2.0.
only our default index.html.foo goes in docroot. images, manual, a
According to Joshua Slive:
> 1. Any objection to combining header.html with top.html and footer.html
> with bottom.html? As long as we are saving filesystem mucking, this seems
> like any easy score, and it makes the whole setup more clear from my
> perspective.
+1
> The same goes for i
From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:28 PM
> I still haven't actually tried this stuff on a real server, so take this
> with a grain of salt. But anyway, here are some comments/questions based
> on a slightly more careful look:
>
> 1. Any objection to combini
