On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> > Yes, Apache+Packages is certainly hard to install,
>
> Yeah, but it's not. Particularly mod_perl, which is, if you believe
> the reports, installed on a majority (ie >50%) of Apache servers.
> (Netcraft.)
Ex
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > I was today looking at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/install.html and
> > found it to be ... how to put this nicely ... suboptimal. It contains
> > little nuggets like "Apache is designed to be configured and
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Yes, Apache+Packages is certainly hard to install,
Yeah, but it's not. Particularly mod_perl, which is, if you believe
the reports, installed on a majority (ie >50%) of Apache servers.
(Netcraft.)
For a mod_perl install, you go into the mod_perl directo
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I was today looking at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/install.html and
> found it to be ... how to put this nicely ... suboptimal. It contains
> little nuggets like "Apache is designed to be configured and run from
> the same set of directories where it is c
