Re: Section titles in docs

2000-09-11 Thread Rich Bowen
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > Rich Bowen wrote: > > > > My preference is to omit the "directive" from each > > Consistency is good, but please remeber that a *lot* of things/places > link directly to directive description fragments, and someone might > follow a link and not have a lot of ment

Re: Section titles in docs

2000-09-11 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Rich Bowen wrote: > > My preference is to omit the "directive" from each Consistency is good, but please remeber that a *lot* of things/places link directly to directive description fragments, and someone might follow a link and not have a lot of mental context about what they'll see when they ge

Re: Section titles in docs

2000-09-11 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Joshua Slive wrote: > > Which also brings up the question: Should there be a "style sheet" for > the modules files. I'd say yes. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar Apache Software Foundation "Apache Server for Dummies"

Unsubscribe" Re: Section titles in docs

2000-09-10 Thread Bob & Letha McCray
- Original Message - From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Apache Docs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 10:08 AM Subject: Re: Section titles in docs > On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > In some of the d

Re: Section titles in docs

2000-09-10 Thread Joshua Slive
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, Rich Bowen wrote: > In some of the docs, we have titles like "LogLevel directive", whereas > in other places, we have things like "ThreadsPerChild." Although I > realize that this is not a big deal, inconsistency like this is annoying > to me. My preference is to omit the "dire

Section titles in docs

2000-09-10 Thread Rich Bowen
In some of the docs, we have titles like "LogLevel directive", whereas in other places, we have things like "ThreadsPerChild." Although I realize that this is not a big deal, inconsistency like this is annoying to me. My preference is to omit the "directive" from each, but I wondered if there were