Re: Urgent 2.0 issues

2000-12-19 Thread rbb
Applied. Thanks. :-) Ryan On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Joshua Slive wrote: > Ryan, > > Here is my suggestion for a change to incorporate the 2.0 docs in the > website. Along with that small change, I also made two other fixes in the > index.html page: > > 1. Added a missing period in the Apache 2

Re: Urgent 2.0 issues

2000-12-19 Thread rbb
I'll try to apply these tonight. Ryan On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Joshua Slive wrote: > Ryan, > > Here is my suggestion for a change to incorporate the 2.0 docs in the > website. Along with that small change, I also made two other fixes in the > index.html page: > > 1. Added a missing period in th

Re: Urgent 2.0 issues

2000-12-18 Thread Joshua Slive
Ryan, Here is my suggestion for a change to incorporate the 2.0 docs in the website. Along with that small change, I also made two other fixes in the index.html page: 1. Added a missing period in the Apache 2.0 announcement. 2. Commented out the mirror link, since httpd.apache.org is not mirro

Re: Urgent 2.0 issues

2000-12-17 Thread Joshua Slive
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'll try to look at the STATUS file today, but I am focused on a few known > bugs that I want to get rid of ASAP, so it may take me a little while. No problem. Thanks for the info. I have a problem with the filter stuff which I will address in a n

Re: Urgent 2.0 issues

2000-12-17 Thread rbb
> 1. Installation docs: I can't even compile the most recent alpha on any of > my systems, so I am at a loss on how to even start this. To compile the most recent alpha, just remove the test target from all Makefiles. This is an issue that we are aware of. :-( The installation docs should be v

Urgent 2.0 issues

2000-12-17 Thread Joshua Slive
These are the things that I think really need to be done pronto with the 2.0 docs. More details are in the STATUS file in the repository. 1. Installation docs: I can't even compile the most recent alpha on any of my systems, so I am at a loss on how to even start this. 2. Filters: I think we nee