On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
> According to Joshua Slive:
>
> > I still haven't actually tried this stuff on a real server, so take this
> > with a grain of salt.
>
> BTW, here are two examples of real servers to play with...
>
> http://www.cablewireless.de/ (based on version 1.
According to Joshua Slive:
> I still haven't actually tried this stuff on a real server, so take this
> with a grain of salt.
BTW, here are two examples of real servers to play with...
http://www.cablewireless.de/ (based on version 1.2, en, de, fr, us)
http://www.unix-ag.org/ (based on
From: "Lars Eilebrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 6:01 PM
> Are we now keeping the error docs in httpd-2.0 instead of httpd-docs-2.0?
> I just noticed that OtherBill moved some of the files to httpd-2.0.
only our default index.html.foo goes in do
e same goes for including contact.html and spacer.html directly
> in header and footer where appropriate.
-1
contact.html cannot be included, because it contains the info text
about the admin or other contact persons and is available in
multiple languages.
spacer.html may be used in the error do
From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:28 PM
> I still haven't actually tried this stuff on a real server, so take this
> with a grain of salt. But anyway, here are some comments/questions based
> on a slightly more careful look:
>
> 1. Any objection to combini
I still haven't actually tried this stuff on a real server, so take this
with a grain of salt. But anyway, here are some comments/questions based
on a slightly more careful look:
1. Any objection to combining header.html with top.html and footer.html
with bottom.html? As long as we are saving fi
