On 2001-08-09 at 13h30, possibly To [EMAIL PROTECTED] et al.,
the keyboard of "Joshua Slive" chattered:
>
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > >
> > H'm. I do not think so. IIRC, the URI is the complete bit,
> > but the *path* stops at either the path-info or the query-string,
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Tegels, Kent wrote:
> So I don't add to any more mess...
>
> IIS 5.x+ has an interesting way of dealing with this -- it treats URI as a
> Stem (protocol to ?) and a Query (after ?), then logs them as different
> fields. I'm not familiar enough with the thread or how Apache doe
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> >
> > According to the RFCs as I've read them, the URL path should
> > be everything following the hostname/port (including the
> > query string).
>
> H'm. I do not think so. IIRC, the URI is the comple
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> It seems to me that
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_log_config.html
> is wrong when it says that %...U logs "The URL path requested".
> In the case of
> http://example.com/one/two/three/four.html?five=six
> the %U will log
> /one/
It seems to me that
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_log_config.html
is wrong when it says that %...U logs "The URL path requested".
In the case of
http://example.com/one/two/three/four.html?five=six
the %U will log
/one/two/three/four.html
According to the RFCs as I've rea
