Re: [Apertium-stuff] Potential replacement for GCI

2020-06-10 Thread Shardul Chiplunkar
On the other hand, reaching out to young developers so that they join our community is absolutely necessary for the survival of Apertium. At the university level, perhaps faculty members who are associated with Apertium and the (computational) linguistics department a

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Potential replacement for GCI

2020-06-10 Thread Mikel L. Forcada
Samuel, thanks for the heads-up. See [1] A replacement for Google Code-In, Apertium Code-In, would be hard to organize for an already quite overworked community. No matter how much we complained about Melange, Google provided invaluable support to run it which would be quite hard to duplicate

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Potential replacement for GCI

2020-06-10 Thread Samuel Sloniker
It might also be good to focus more on the non-coding ways of contributing. On Wed, Jun 10, 2020, 21:25 Samuel Sloniker wrote: > Hi, > Google has cancelled Google Code-in. I was wondering if Apertium could > start a replacement. Perhaps we could partner with some other FOSS > organizations? > __

[Apertium-stuff] Potential replacement for GCI

2020-06-10 Thread Samuel Sloniker
Hi, Google has cancelled Google Code-in. I was wondering if Apertium could start a replacement. Perhaps we could partner with some other FOSS organizations? ___ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net