Re: [Apertium-stuff] Implementation of weights in lttoolbox

2018-08-07 Thread Tommi A Pirinen
Xavi Ivars wrote: > [-- multipart/alternative, Encoding 7bit, 61 Zeilen --] > > [-- text/plain, Encoding quoted-printable, Zeichensatz: UTF-8, 28 Zeilen > --] > > Missatge de Flammie del dia dg., 5 d’ag. 2018 a les 14:54: > >> >> [...] >> >> There is a -signed weight system in e.g. openfs

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Implementation of weights in lttoolbox

2018-08-06 Thread Xavi Ivars
Missatge de Flammie del dia dg., 5 d’ag. 2018 a les 14:54: > > [...] > > There is a -signed weight system in e.g. openfst that was added exactly > for this intuition of weights, so it operates on R-, min, - instead of > R+, max, +, maybe it could be an ok solution? > > You mean still having "bigg

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Implementation of weights in lttoolbox

2018-08-05 Thread Abinash Senapati
Hello again *[MAJOR UPDATE]* lttoolbox now also supports weights in the entries in the dictionary file. $ cat test.dix > > > > > > >> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZÀÁÂÄÅÆÇÈÉÊËÍÑÒÓÔÕÖØÙÚÜČĐŊŠŦŽabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzàáâäåæçèéêëíñòóôõöøùúüčđŋšŧž­- > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Implementation of weights in lttoolbox

2018-08-05 Thread Flammie
[I accidentally sent earlier reply by mail only, sorry for duplicates:] Francis Tyers wrote: > El 2018-08-04 19:44, Xavi Ivars escribió: >> This is great! >> >> However, is a bit counter-intuitive that lower weight wins. In other >> cases (like lexical selection rules), higher weights win. (I a

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Implementation of weights in lttoolbox

2018-08-04 Thread Francis Tyers
El 2018-08-04 19:44, Xavi Ivars escribió: This is great! However, is a bit counter-intuitive that lower weight wins. In other cases (like lexical selection rules), higher weights win. Would it be possible to do something so weights work consistently? This is a good question. And one that pro

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Implementation of weights in lttoolbox

2018-08-04 Thread Xavi Ivars
This is great! However, is a bit counter-intuitive that lower weight wins. In other cases (like lexical selection rules), higher weights win. Would it be possible to do something so weights work consistently? Missatge de Francis Tyers del dia ds., 4 d’ag. 2018 a les 17:53: > El 2018-08-03 15:4

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Implementation of weights in lttoolbox

2018-08-04 Thread Francis Tyers
El 2018-08-03 15:42, Abinash Senapati escribió: _ Hello developers, I am a student currently working on the idea EXTEND LTTOOLBOX TO HAVE THE POWER OF HFST for my GSoC project. So, I am here talk about the new modifications that are now a part of the lttoolbox and want all of you to try them out.

[Apertium-stuff] Implementation of weights in lttoolbox

2018-08-03 Thread Abinash Senapati
Hello developers, I am a student currently working on the idea *Extend lttoolbox to have the power of HFST *for my GSoC project. So, I am here talk about the new modifications that are now a part of the lttoolbox and want all of you to try them out. As a part of my Coding Challenge I have developed