чт, 14 мар. 2019 г. в 04:01, Tino Didriksen :
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 05:54, Jonathan Washington <
> jonathan.n.washing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> By "agree on CC-BY-SA", I assume you mean "agree to dual-license the code
>> as CC-BY-SA in addition to GPLv3+"?
>>
>
> Not really. That would be super
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 05:54, Jonathan Washington <
jonathan.n.washing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> By "agree on CC-BY-SA", I assume you mean "agree to dual-license the code
> as CC-BY-SA in addition to GPLv3+"?
>
Not really. That would be superfluous because CC-BY-SA can already be used
by GPLv3+ proj
ср, 13 мар. 2019 г. в 08:44, Tino Didriksen :
> Unfortunately, Apertium licensing is messy. Most things are under GPLv2+,
> some things are GPLv3+, and a few are CC-BY-SA.
>
> - apertium-eng is GPLv3+
> - apertium-cat is GPLv2+ (note 2)
> - apertium-eng-cat is GPLv3+
>
> So any derivative of those
El 2019-03-13 12:42, Tino Didriksen escribió:
Unfortunately, Apertium licensing is messy. Most things are under
GPLv2+, some things are GPLv3+, and a few are CC-BY-SA.
- apertium-eng is GPLv3+
- apertium-cat is GPLv2+ (note 2)
- apertium-eng-cat is GPLv3+
So any derivative of those would combin
Unfortunately, Apertium licensing is messy. Most things are under GPLv2+,
some things are GPLv3+, and a few are CC-BY-SA.
- apertium-eng is GPLv3+
- apertium-cat is GPLv2+ (note 2)
- apertium-eng-cat is GPLv3+
So any derivative of those would combine to GPLv3+, which you rightly
identify as only
Hello,
Jaume Ortolà (contributing mainly to apertium-spa-cat) and I are preparing
a project to create a free ("libre") English-Catalan dictionary for
Softcatalà [1]. This is part of a call by Fundació.cat [2] for projects
promoting the Catalan language in technology, which will receive funding if
