Hi,
We attempted to create all the files needed for supervised training.
We assumed trying to interpret the usage info output by apertium-tagger
that the input files should have the following format:
apertium-tagger[-d] -s=n DIC CRP TSX TAGGER_DATA HTAG UNTAG
DIC: full expanded dictiona
2012/4/2 Orosz György :
> We are one step closer now, but just wondering if there is any easy way to
> create a .dix file from Apertium stream format. (or any easy way to use an
> analysed text file for the tagger, instead of enumerating lemmata and
> paradigms.)
That usually involves much messing
Hi,
>> And FILES are:
>> DIC: full expanded dictionary file
>> CRP: training text corpus file
>> TSX: tagger specification file, in XML format
>> TAGGER_DATA: tagger data file, built in the training and used while
>> tagging
>> HTAG:hand-tagged t
Thanks for the help,
Gyorgy
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 14:43, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
> 2012/3/28 Francis Tyers :
> > It isn't used for morphological analysis, the morphological analyser is
> > used for that. I believe that the expansion is used, along with the TSX
> > file, for calculating the ambigu
2012/3/28 Francis Tyers :
> It isn't used for morphological analysis, the morphological analyser is
> used for that. I believe that the expansion is used, along with the TSX
> file, for calculating the ambiguity classes. But someone else might know
> better.
It's the analysis of the expansion. Con
El dc 28 de 03 de 2012 a les 12:43 +0200, en/na Orosz György va
escriure:
> Thanks, for clarifying things.
>
> > It is clear. I am wondering about the supervised training:
> is it
> > possible to train the tagger (in a supervised manner)
> without creating
>
Thanks, for clarifying things.
> It is clear. I am wondering about the supervised training: is it
> > possible to train the tagger (in a supervised manner) without creating
> > all the lexical resources used by the MT system? What is
> > not obvious for me, that why are these parameters needed:
>
El dc 28 de 03 de 2012 a les 10:20 +0200, en/na Orosz György va
escriure:
> Hi,
>
>
> thanks for helping.
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:25, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
> wrote:
> Orosz György writes:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I am asking your help, hope someo
Hi,
thanks for helping.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:25, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
> Orosz György writes:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I am asking your help, hope someone can clarify these thigs: I am
> wondering if it is
> > possible to use the apertium tagger as a standalone application, without
Orosz György writes:
> Dear All,
>
> I am asking your help, hope someone can clarify these thigs: I am wondering
> if it is
> possible to use the apertium tagger as a standalone application, without
> creating all
> the resources used by the MT system.
It's possible to use it by itself, like
Dear All,
I am asking your help, hope someone can clarify these thigs: I am wondering
if it is possible to use the apertium tagger as a standalone application,
without creating all the resources used by the MT system. We have a
morphologically disambiguated training corpus, and a morphological
ana
11 matches
Mail list logo
