2012/10/8 Mikel Forcada m...@dlsi.ua.es
http://pastebin.com/GGzfM5qc
Calling a list would just involve putting it's contents in the rule.
So with or it would work like an OR, but without, it would work like a
sequence.
I don't like this at all. This is very opaque. I would not use the
El dl 08 de 10 de 2012 a les 07:04 +0200, en/na Mikel Forcada va
escriure:
Fran,
I'd like to include the possibility for lists in the LRX format. This
would involve adding a couple of new tags,
That should not be a problem as long as the old format works in the new
definition
and
El dl 08 de 10 de 2012 a les 07:50 +0200, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
va escriure:
Mikel Forcada m...@dlsi.ua.es writes:
Fran,
I'd like to include the possibility for lists in the LRX format. This
would involve adding a couple of new tags,
That should not be a problem as long as
Hey all,
I'd like to include the possibility for lists in the LRX format. This
would involve adding a couple of new tags, and changing the root tag,
the idea is to have something like:
http://pastebin.com/GGzfM5qc
Calling a list would just involve putting it's contents in the rule.
So with or
Mikel Forcada m...@dlsi.ua.es writes:
Fran,
I'd like to include the possibility for lists in the LRX format. This
would involve adding a couple of new tags,
That should not be a problem as long as the old format works in the new
definition
and changing the root tag,
You would have to
