Re: [Apertium-stuff] Lexical selection also in source language

Joonas, well, in my message I was advocating more of a division of work (CG for morphosyntactical disambiguation with lexical selection dealing with problems related to lemmas). This does not mean that you cannot do everything with CG — in fact, I see no principled reason why you can't. A couple

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Lexical selection also in source language

Thanks for the infromation, Tino. So as we can achieve 100% disambiguation with CG then there's no need for adding extra lexical selection module after the CG! :) On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Tino Didriksen wrote: > On 21 February 2016 at 17:07, Joonas Kylmälä

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Lexical selection also in source language

Hi Joonas: I always thought that the role of Constraint Grammar (CG) in Apertium was more of a morphosyntactic desambiguation. Therefore, even if the CG processor completely solved the morphosyntactic ambiguity of each and every source-language surface form, there could still well be the chance