On 03/20/2017 02:10 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> public class BooleanSyntaxChecker extends SyntaxChecker
> {
> /**
> * A static instance of BooleanSyntaxChecker
> */
> public static final BooleanSyntaxChecker INSTANCE = new
> BooleanSyntaxChecker( SchemaConstants.BOOLEAN_SYNTAX
Le 19/03/2017 à 17:47, Emmanuel Lecharny a écrit :
> Thanks, Stefan.
>
> I'll have a look at generics tonite.
>
> Regarding the need of a builder for each class, I think it would help
> habing a consistent system across all the SCs.
>
> Otherwise, this idea should apply to the other schema object
Thanks, Stefan.
I'll have a look at generics tonite.
Regarding the need of a builder for each class, I think it would help
habing a consistent system across all the SCs.
Otherwise, this idea should apply to the other schema objects.
Le dim. 19 mars 2017 à 10:58, Stefan Seelmann a
écrit :
> O
On 03/17/2017 11:00 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> The only requirement is that each SC has its own builder (we can't put
> this code in the abstract SC, because it's abstract...)
With some generics magic it should at least be possible to move common
stuff (setOid) to the parent.
Otherwise, I'm n
