On 25/01/10 13:22, Matthew Swift wrote:
[...]
For cases where client apps want to use a control for which there is
no existing sub-class implementation we provided them the option of
using the GenericControl class instead of being forced to implement
a sub-class. The GenericControl class
Matthew Swift a écrit :
On 25/01/10 13:22, Matthew Swift wrote:
[...]
For cases where client apps want to use a control for which there is
no existing sub-class implementation we provided them the option of
using the GenericControl class instead of being forced to implement
a sub-class.
Matthew Swift a écrit :
snip/
GenericControl(String oid) // non-critical, null value
GenericControl(String oid, boolean isCritical) // null value
Makes sense to add this constructor, but for Control with *no* value
(semantically more accurate, compared to *null* value).